Posted on 06/08/2006 4:39:24 AM PDT by conservativecorner
President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.
President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.
The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:
At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.
What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:
In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.
To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.
The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.
The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:
The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.
Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.
Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?
Mr. Corsi is the author of several books, including "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" (along with John O'Neill), "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil" (along with Craig R. Smith), and "Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American Politicians." He is a frequent guest on the G. Gordon Liddy radio show. He will soon co-author a new book with Jim Gilchrist on the Minuteman Project.
Expanding NAFTA is hardly the same as having a North American Union. NAFTA is simply a trade treaty. We've had those since 1776.
the great sucking sound Redux.
For whatever reasons, selfish or selfless, was Perot right?
Canada ping!
Please FReepmail me to get on or off this ping list.
In earlier days this would have been called treason.
Today the Bushbots will call it brilliant diplomacy, the very same thing that NWO bot Clinton would have brought forward had he dared.
Trans-Texas Corridor of the North American Union
Today the Bushbots will call it brilliant diplomacy, the very same thing that NWO bot Clinton would have brought forward had he dared.
EXCELLENT point! If this behavior had been during Clinton's term, the same people, largely the Bushbots, would have been raging the same as those of us opposed to Bush's immigration/bordercontrol/domestic security policies, agenda, and opinions.
Meanwhile, Zarqawi's dead, which is great news. But in other news, U.S. to be overrun by Mexico. So we get a ticket for a free meal at a nice restaurant, but when we get back, our home is gone.
Fortunetly, it looks like Corsi just makes this stuff up.
As I have said previously, Bush plans to destroy American WASP culture in the USA by diluting it with 150 million mexicans, and obliterating our borders and many of our laws.
Please line up on the left to get fitted for your tinfoil hats...
http://www.spp.gov
The Bushbots have said here on FR that this is a good idea......
And this is news? I've been screaming about this for years.
Indeed he does.
Keep in mind Corsi is the guy who wrote an entire book supporting the "oil is not a fossil fuel" theory who presented the theory he was attacking as "oil comes from dead dinosaurs."
Ya, that's it. He's making it all up. LOL!
Fortunetly, it looks like Corsi just makes this stuff up.
I think it's time for you to discover Google and spellchecker. (try CFR)
Acknowledging the existence and role of the CFR (an agency founded by the heads of the federal reserve) could get this thread pulled.
Corsi has well established himself as either a profound idiot, or a liar (difficult to tell one from the other in many cases).
Hell...........our congressmen can't even do an effective job of hiding their bribes, do you really think they have time to deal with issuses like national security??
Already posted here....and most definately not made up...some remarkable FReepers dug thouroughly to the bottom of this cess pool and exposed some rather startling facts...if ya got the time... check it out.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1634942/posts
I have posted this link before. http://www.oas.org/
I think he's a remarkable blend of both.
check the link in post number 22. No tin foil needed. You can't argue the facts.
No, but you can ignore them. Or better yet, distract by screaming about gay marriage.
Could the national party be any more obvious in their parading of this issue [gay marriage amendment] so that we forget about the really important issues facing our country?
Oh, no! And it was just announced that the Build-A-Burgers are going to have another secret meeting!
Wow, they have all this stuff figured out already!!! It's no wonder the governments want to do nothing about the borders. They don't want the borders!!!!! I wonder how easy it would be to get one of these biometric border passes.
Looks like Bush has some explaining to do, if any of the so-called reporters had the nerve to ask. Can you imagine a bigger story than the President of the United States essentially planning to dissolve the country? What a great campaign issue for the Rat party. BTW, if this is true Bush should not only be impeached but locked up for treason.
Well, let's see if there's any truth to it before getting out the pitchforks. Actually, I doubt there's any truth to it at all.
I don't know if there is, but these sites were pretty interesting to read;
http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/NorthAmerica_TF_final.pdf
http://www.senate.gov/~foreign/testimony/2005/PastorTestimony050609.pdf
http://www.american.edu/ia/cnas/pdfs/PastorTestimonyCanada.pdf
Only if Mexico goes Capitalist (and improves its economy to solve illegal migrant problems), Canada goes Conservative, and people are united using English, maybe a good idea. Meanwhile, the thin border down Mexico to lock out migrants and terrorists from there, and the access of the Arctic islands north of Canada is attrative for national security.
I don't believe one word of it!
FINALLY!!!!!! Someone else gets it!!!! I saw what Bush was up to the first time I saw the TTC map pasted and connected the dots with Bush's globalist position. That's when all the pieces fell into place.
Nothing has changed since then to alter the facts.
With an ample supply of Reynold's Wrap, I've maintained that this was the ultimate goal since NAFTA was introduced. It should seem obvious: the Euros merge into one gigantic common market, so to compete, North America has to do the same. Or so the reasoning goes ...
It also goes to explain Bush's reluctance to control Mexican immigration.
Why fix a problem when you can send the problem to the United States where we get to deal with it? It's certainly worked for them so far.
I think that there's probably quite a bit of truth to it. We know that there's a large political contingent that would be in favor of it in spite of their perhaps not having specifically voiced themselves as so. The DimLibs in particular and the RINOs.
But given the seeming sheer and utter lack of concern for the protection and defense of our own sovereignty, one is only left to conclude that that is exactly the desire of Bush, et.al.
I'm not a big conspiracy theorist by any stretch, but I also realize that not all things are "discussed openly" and am not foolish or naive enough to believe that they are.
And it would be force despite what our elected representatives can be bribed, persuaded, hoodwinked into doing.
What a CROCK!
I'm glad we agree we have differing opinions, I'll respect yours if you respect mine.
LOL it could always be, but nothing suprises me anymore. It could explain why the government really doesn't seem to want to do anything with the borders. And since the Council of Foreign Relations is slightly left of center, it would not suprise me that they would be doing this.
Of course Bush isn't going to do this all by himself. He, like congress, is nothing more than a figurehead for the financial syndicates (new world royalty) that have bought our political system. The process has been slowly evolving for decades. Ronald Reagan was very distrustful of the Bush machine. Ross Perot tried to warn us of its dangers. The clintons and the Bushes seem to be responding to the same core world agenda, while distracting us with the hate issues of abortion and homosexuality. Please line up with your head in the ground and look for security and ignore the reality that is biting you in the rear.
Which is why Britain should have made EFTA strong and never joined the EU
Well, this might explain why our local grocery store was out of aluminum foil yesterday. Takes a lot of tinfoil to follow some of these topics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.