[CWOJackson]

The Dem's are miffed? You should check out these posts from right here on FR. My favorite so far:

"Big Deal. In WW2 Zarqawi would have been the equivalent of a low end german officer. Our great military has been reduced to chasing and killing radical office clerks."

[Jameison]

"The Dem's are miffed? You should check out these posts from right here on FR. My favorite so far:
"Big Deal. In WW2 Zarqawi would have been the equivalent of a low end german officer. Our great military has been reduced to chasing and killing radical office clerks.""

The DU/Kos trolls are everywhere.
Sigh.

[RetiredSWO]

So then what would that have made Goebbels??? Janitor?

[mikemach5]

"Big Deal. In WW2 Zarqawi would have been the equivalent of a low end german officer. Our great military has been reduced to chasing and killing radical office clerks."

But... I thought Zarqawi was the greatest military genius since George Washington? Oh, that's right. When he's alive and causing mayhem he's the Great Revolutionary. Now that he's dead, he's never been a big deal. I get it.

[Robert A Cook PE]

"Big Deal. In WW2 Zarqawi would have been the equivalent of a low end german officer. Our great military has been reduced to chasing and killing radical office clerks."

More like Goering. Head of the SS, Army Chief of Staff, or Eichmann. Postions like that are a better comparison.

Sure, they can replace him. But the replacement can also be killed. And while the replacement is contacting people, and trying to "build up" his (new) network of henchmen and "trusted do-sayers" and safe-houses and suppliers and funding sources and clerics and profiteers, he can't be effective.

And every contact is a potential source of a new bomb on his head.