Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
Yes, their idea of hygeine and ours vary considerably. If it remains up to humans to catch the disease from birds, general precautions such as washing hands, disposing of the infected carcasses of wild birds properly, washing away bird feces, etc. should keep most people safe.

But it is those selfsame abysmal hygenic conditions, with people living in close affinity with livestock which make the third world a bioreactor for developing variants which are readily transmitted from human to human.

While poor chicken farmers are unlikely to show up on the average American's doorstep, they are the lower end of a generally polarized economic spectrum. If they pass it on to the servants who pass it on to their employer, who is wealthy by most any standard, the disease could travel anywhere.

In the event that transition occurs, the disease has the potential to travel the globe in under 48 hours, and only one infected person would be necessary to spread it to a considerable number of others.

Containment would be a problem.

Now, that has not happened yet.

There is presently no readily (human to human) transmissible variant. Hopefully, there will not be.

As for political correctness, that was not my intent.

Nor was it my intent to equate the currently degraded sense of hygiene present in America today (as opposed to 30 years ago--a result of antibiotics causing people to become generally more casual toward sepsis) to the general absence of hygiene as we know it present among the poorer folks of the third world.

At issue is not whether we in America will catch the virus from the birds (even though those who grow poultry or work in the poultry industry may be at risk if the disease makes its way here), so much as from each other or from someone from elsewhere.

As I must stress, until the virus mutates to a form which is readily passed from human to human, the latter is cause for watchful concern. As long as the virus is not here--in wild birds or tame, the risk is very low indeed.

14 posted on 06/09/2006 12:32:07 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

I ranted a bit regarding, political correctness, and am sorry about that, for it was only meant for lurkers and those who like to, fly off the handle for pretty much any old reason.

You are quite correct on all accounts. And I don't think we have a thing to worry about with that. It's all just a diversion because we have far more pressing problems in this country. Besides, one doesn't have to look very far before realizing who will benefit most by creating a mass-hysteria scenario. The drug companies that make the Tamiflu. Anyway, I just read a couple days ago that large doses of vitamin A will take care of it all. It all has to do with the oxidation process, which causes the decomposition, and thus the nasty disease are lurking about. Fish oil and other anti-oxidant substances would be an excellent bet. But of course, the FDA cannot patent natural remedies and make mucho deniro $$$$, so that makes them sad...


15 posted on 06/09/2006 1:10:24 PM PDT by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson