Skip to comments.
Bolton rejects ‘grand bargain’ with Iran
Financial Times (UK) ^
| 09JUN06
| Daniel Dombey
Posted on 06/09/2006 8:04:57 PM PDT by familyop
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
1
posted on
06/09/2006 8:05:01 PM PDT
by
familyop
To: familyop
John Bolton is the best U.N. Ambassador we have ever had.... PERIOD
2
posted on
06/09/2006 8:10:11 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
(THE DEMOCRATS OFFER NOTHING FOR THE FUTURE AND THEY LIE ABOUT THE PAST)
To: familyop
Mr Bolton, who describes himself as not much a carrots man Luckily we have the right man in the right place at the right time.
3
posted on
06/09/2006 8:10:24 PM PDT
by
burzum
(Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.--Adm. Rickover)
To: familyop
He said the EU, which conducted negotiations with Iran from 2003, had been embarrassed by a declaration by a former Iranian official that during that time the Islamic republic had worked on nuclear techniques. Say what you will about Bush, but appointing John Bolten to the UN is almost as important as Conservative judges on the SCOTUS.
To: familyop
The state department has been our worst enemy when dealing with these guys. I thought Condo was going to fix it, but she is crapping all over the U.S. just like her predecessor.
5
posted on
06/09/2006 8:15:00 PM PDT
by
mirkwood
(Gun control isn't about guns. It's about control.)
To: MJY1288
He's good to great and I like him, but we also had Jeanne Kirkpatrick. She was no slouch.
6
posted on
06/09/2006 8:16:00 PM PDT
by
garyhope
To: familyop
7
posted on
06/09/2006 8:16:40 PM PDT
by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc. 10:2)
To: garyhope
8
posted on
06/09/2006 8:17:18 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
(THE DEMOCRATS OFFER NOTHING FOR THE FUTURE AND THEY LIE ABOUT THE PAST)
To: familyop
9
posted on
06/09/2006 8:18:19 PM PDT
by
SuzyQue
To: familyop
Well I'm going to predict that the Iranians will not come to the table and deal.
The question will then become, now what?
And I don't place much hope in the UN for coming up with a solution either.
In spite of the clear dangers the next question I am going to ask presents, and I will state clearly that I do understand those dangers, is it not time to begin openly discussing a nuclear strike on Iran? I am very serious in what I propose. We will ultimately have to face the fact that if we don't launch one, we will all just be sitting and waiting for the moment when Iran does.
This is a moment for us to make the doctrine of preemption as well understood as we possibly can.
To: familyop
Theyve got both feet on the accelerator....." Good. It doesn't make the vehicle go any faster, but it drastically slows your reaction time when you need to brake and avoid a crash.
11
posted on
06/09/2006 8:22:23 PM PDT
by
edpc
To: operation clinton cleanup
I agree. He is refreshingly pro-American.
12
posted on
06/09/2006 8:22:29 PM PDT
by
PghBaldy
(If my ancestors acted like the current crop of "immigrants", you would have to "press 2" for Polish.)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: familyop
John Bolton for President.
To: PghBaldy
15
posted on
06/09/2006 8:26:08 PM PDT
by
Cinnamon
To: PhilipFreneau
Bahahaha....
That would smoke the servers over at Kos and DU. I'd like to float the rumor just to see their reactions.
16
posted on
06/09/2006 8:26:45 PM PDT
by
edpc
To: Cinnamon
What a silly cartoon. Bolton would never bother to knock.
;-)
17
posted on
06/09/2006 8:28:12 PM PDT
by
edpc
To: Cinnamon
LOL. I saw him on Fox the other day. Reminds me of why I love the President so. I may not always agree with him, but he's done a heckuva lot of good for this country. We have had some great appointments, but this one in particular is a keeper.
18
posted on
06/09/2006 8:29:45 PM PDT
by
PghBaldy
(If my ancestors acted like the current crop of "immigrants", you would have to "press 2" for Polish.)
To: StJacques
No, we should never plan a nuclear strike on Iran. There are millions of Iranians that like and respect Americans, and we would be making serious mistake in harming these good folks. The key would be a severe attack and destruction of Syria, taking out their armed forces and civilian population by the millions. Syria needs a good lesson, and if their people cannot overthrow their government, then so be it!!! When a nation commits itself to war, the object is total victory. Syria should be sent to hell, and maybe the Iranians will get the message as to reality in this world. However, it would even be better if we found Bin Laden and his ilk and slaughtered them all. I think the Iranians would begin to get the message!!!
To: PghBaldy
I agree. He is refreshingly pro-American.Indeed. Jean Kirkpatrick would be proud!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson