The Hollywood lefties love to tell us that the homos are normal, and there's nothing wrong with being gay.
But see how fast they throw them overboard and proclaim how masculine there movie is when big money is on the line.
Gotta love it.
there = their
More heterosexual than Wolverine of X-Men? I don't think that's possible. He's a foul-mouthed, roughneck musclehead trying to steal Jean Grey from Cyclops in both movies! Can't get much more hetero than that!
Internet buzz during casting was that the lead actor (not the character) is the one who is gay. Supposedly he will "come out" just before or during the release to add publicity to the film.
Lois was a tranny?
Isn't the director gay? And didn't he admit there was homosexual subtext purposely put in the X Men movies?
A Virtuous superman who wants to get with a virtuous Lois, who is shacked up with her "boyfriend" and child. Yeah, that's the superman I remember.
I am sick to death of the gay agenda! There is a gay connection in almost every movie now. I doubt that there are that many gays, proportionally, in our population. Ever notice how gays are always really good people in the movies,too? They are trying to convey that gays could never be villains. I guess they won't be making any Jeffery Dahmer or John Wayne Gacy movies!
Superman is not supposed to be vulnerable, he is supposed to be invulnerable, except to Kryptonite of course. But if you make him gay he becomes a vulnerable girly man.
Hollywood is a community of gays. They can't help but produce gay films for their gay friends.
It's in their DNA.
and Spidey is a little swishy
Reuters... they naturally the pick a pose to highlight superman's umm... ya know...
Superman is in love with Lois Lane, not Jimmy Olsen.
Superman is gay, always was.
How sick has Hollywood gotten? The original story of superman was based on the story of Moses. To now make him gay is keeping with their queer agenda
Very Clintonian.
Time Warner, my Yorkie could run it better then Dick Parsons.
LA Times:
"In addition to drawing poor reviews and generating weak word-of-mouth, the studio's 1997 summer release "Batman & Robin" was criticized for having too much homoerotic appeal, including nipples on Batman's suit. George Clooney, the film's star, has joked, "I could have played him straight but I didn't. I made him gay."
The film barely grossed $100 million in domestic theaters, and Warners has said privately that "Batman & Robin" turned out so poorly that it nearly killed off the Caped Crusader franchise (the series was resuscitated with last year's "Batman Begins," a global blockbuster)."
That leaves open a lot of territory!
Coming from Hollywood, this could well be "the most heterosexual character he has filmed" and still be a flamer.
Look at the star's picture. He's gayer than gay. The gayest. And his agent has no problem presenting him that way.
I just finished the book.
Think the first Superman movie plotline with better effects.