Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wedding pics for the brides who don't blush
The Sunday Times ^ | June 11, 2006 | John Harlow

Posted on 06/11/2006 3:14:42 AM PDT by MadIvan

WEDDING photography, once a restrained art, is becoming a risqué business. A growing number of American brides are marking their big day by commissioning portraits of themselves in raunchy poses and lingerie, writes John Harlow.

This month, when a quarter of America’s annual 2m weddings take place, brides’ parents are paying up to £6,000 for an “action photographer”, whose brief is to capture their daughter “accidentally” exposing sexy garters or her knickers.

The American wedding is changing fast. Traditionalists have already lamented a switch to homemade vows, such as “to stay together so long as we make each other laugh”, and a large-scale abandonment of white since Sarah Jessica Parker, the star of Sex and the City, got married in black.

The paparazzi-style wedding photographs are the latest shock to the establishment, although some clerics are going along with it.

Frank Ray, a Baptist minister in Tennessee, was the target of outrage when his bride published nuptial snaps of herself and her maids of honour dressed in plunging black leather bustiers on the internet. “It was fabulous fun, and something we shall always remember,” said the 58-year-old minister.

Wedding photographers say such pictures are becoming the rage across all sections of US society. Steven Gross, a Chicago photographer, said he had taken nearly 8,000 shots at a recent £100,000 wedding, but the most prominent one in the album was a close-up of bridal cleavage.

“Brides, and sometimes the groom, want to show off their gym-fit bodies,” said a spokesman for Equinox, a gym chain that offers a “wedding boot camp”.

Richard Albans, a photographer in Los Angeles, turned to wedding work after being punched by a Hollywood bodyguard.

“But I did not realise what today’s bride really wants: a true evocation of that moment when she was at her most sexually and socially powerful,” he said.

“She wants to remind her spouse why he married her. It was not just because she looked radiant in white — underneath she was downright dirty and dangerous in a black garter or red-sequinned bra.

“It’s more Las Vegas showgirl than blushing bride.”

One of his clients, who is marrying later this year, said she was planning on opening the doors to her bridal boudoir for three days before the main event. “I want a big book of photographs, showing everything from me flashing my boobs as I get dressed to my boyfriend having his chest waxed,” she said.

“It’s about intimacy, the real story, as well as silly fun.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: photos; risque; wedding
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last
To: Richard Kimball

Nice photos -- that close-up shot is really great.


61 posted on 06/11/2006 7:57:18 AM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Not directly on topic, but on the theme of weddings.

American Funniest Home Video seems to get a kick out of the shots where the bride or groom smears cake in the other's face. I do not find this funny, in fact I cringe when I see it.

Here it is, one of the most important days of their life, and one is showing complete lack of respect for the other by smearing cake in the other's face (yes I know some find it funny, but a wedding or reception is not the place for funny).

I have been married for 36 years, and I would not have thought to smear cake on my brides face 36 years ago as I would today. I respect her too much to attempt to humiliate her that way.

I often wondered how well those marriages have done with such a beginning. Maybe it is just me, and others find nothing wrong with it, and the couple go on to a long and happy life together, or perhaps, they continued in their ways metaphorically smearing each others faces with cake on a daily basis until one or the other had enough.


62 posted on 06/11/2006 7:59:45 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Heather's getting married this Saturday! Not to downplay her, but you should see MY dress! LOL! I'll send you pics.


63 posted on 06/11/2006 8:43:06 AM PDT by Hildy ("Whenever someone smiles at me all I see is a chimpanzee begging for its life." - Dwight Schrute)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MaryFromMichigan

What wedding pictures don't include a picture of the bride showing her garter? Lighten up, people.


64 posted on 06/11/2006 8:44:16 AM PDT by Hildy ("Whenever someone smiles at me all I see is a chimpanzee begging for its life." - Dwight Schrute)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

I'd ping cyborg and Petronski to this, but they're getting married today. :)


65 posted on 06/11/2006 8:45:58 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary

I partly agree with you, but at an abstract level isn't that what weddings are about in all cultures? Celebrating the health and fecundity of a new generation?

We formalize and channel the urge to reproduce, we give dowry's to show the worth of the bride, we have white dresses to symobolize viginity. Don't get me wrong, I love our traditions and hope that they continue to have meaning in our culture, but there are many many layers of meaning in the wedding, I find it fascinating.



fe·cun·di·ty ( P ) Pronunciation Key (f-knd-t)
n.
The quality or power of producing abundantly; fruitfulness or fertility.
Productive or creative power: fecundity of the mind.


66 posted on 06/11/2006 8:52:38 AM PDT by sgtyork (Prove to us that you can enforce the borders first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Woohoo, high class wedding photos...


67 posted on 06/11/2006 8:55:37 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; Abathar; albee; Alice au Wonderland; Amityschild; andie74; Andy'smom; Augustus McCrae; ...

No amateurs, please.
Send FReepmail if you want on/off ISHP list
The List of Ping Lists

68 posted on 06/11/2006 8:56:10 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Wasss Up?


69 posted on 06/11/2006 8:57:16 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

70 posted on 06/11/2006 9:03:13 AM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
Rich symbolism employed


There are so many avenues of discussion with this picture...
71 posted on 06/11/2006 9:04:11 AM PDT by sully777 (wWBBD: What would Brian Boitano do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

3 shots of tequila and I'd hit it! :-) (OK,, maybe 5)


72 posted on 06/11/2006 9:04:49 AM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

That's Hot.


73 posted on 06/11/2006 9:10:44 AM PDT by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: JoeSixPack1

She wouldn't even allow you in line. :)


74 posted on 06/11/2006 9:11:53 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor


The Nightmare, 1781 by Henry Fuseli

The modern nightmare 2006
75 posted on 06/11/2006 9:13:34 AM PDT by sully777 (wWBBD: What would Brian Boitano do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

Ouch! that hurt! :-)


76 posted on 06/11/2006 9:14:43 AM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Can you vaguely recall when the last time you personally witnessed a female BLUSH?
77 posted on 06/11/2006 9:15:04 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gate2wire

Heck what man of the cloth would defend and cater to homosexuals being NORMAL?


78 posted on 06/11/2006 9:15:50 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
speakin' of which...the groom kinda stands out; he's the one in the Reeboks...

79 posted on 06/11/2006 9:17:42 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (Meep Meep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: MaryFromMichigan

Parents who trained their children WRONG!

Weddings are an excuse to party hardy. Now they've just made them lewd and the crowd loves it. If you're about to be divorced - hey, don't feel bad. Have a party! There are divorce cards and party invitations to celebrate that too!

(Sarcasm off)


80 posted on 06/11/2006 9:19:08 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson