Posted on 06/11/2006 5:02:25 AM PDT by white trash redneck
A motion to boycott Israeli academics, approved two weeks ago by the National Association of Teachers in Further and Higher Education, Britain's largest academic trade union, was cancelled on Sunday afternoon.
Several factors in the boycott's cancellation were cited, foremost among them international pressure from academic organizations. Another influence was the threat of legal proceedings by union members who claimed the boycott would hurt their ability to do research.
The union's official statement had declared that "[The] Conference notes [the] continuing Israeli apartheid policies, including [the] construction of the exclusion wall, and discriminatory educational practices."
A similar boycott against the Bar-Ilan and Haifa Universities was also cancelled last year due to international pressure.
Professor Yosef Yeshurun, Rector [Dean] of Bar-Ilan University and head of the Institute for Academic Freedom, praised the decision. "Academic boycotts hurt the essence of academia," he said.
The boycott had provoked a wave of condemnations from Israeli and British officials and from senior academics and universities in Israel and abroad.
"Around the world this proposal has been rejected as an act of blatant discrimination," said Israel's Ambassador to the UK, Zvi Hefetz. "As a means of promoting dialogue and coexistence in the Middle East, an academic boycott of Israel is counterproductive in the extreme."
The call to consider a boycott of Israeli academics was passed with 106 votes in favor, 71 votes against and 21 abstentions.
"By pursuing such a policy, NATFHE will isolate its members and their students rather than isolating Israeli academics, who are [in] the forefront of international cooperation on academic study and research, including with Palestinian universities and institutions elsewhere in the Arab world," Hefetz added.
The British Foreign and Commonwealth Office Minister Lord Triesman also expressed regret at the boycott vote. "We believe that such academic boycotts are counterproductive and retrograde. Far more can be obtained through dialogue and academic cooperation," he said.
The boycott motion approved by NATFHE will only be effective for three days due to a merger between NATFHE and the Association of University Teachers, a smaller union, which is scheduled to take place on June 1. NATFHE has indicated that the new body will not be bound by the decision.
Last year the AUT voted to boycott Haifa and Bar-Ilan universities, charging them with complicity in Israel's "suppression of the Palestinians." The council of the association reversed the decision after objections by leading scholars and academic organizations.
Following NATFHE's vote on Monday, University of Haifa President Aaron Ben-Ze'ev said the university strongly condemned the boycott decision.
"Any attempt to connect politics and academic research is pure McCarthyism," Ben-Ze'ev said. "The university will continue working in collaboration with its colleagues in Israel, Britain and elsewhere, in order to protect the principle of academic freedom," he said.
Professor Gerald Steinberg, director of the Interdisciplinary Program on Conflict Management and Negotiation and a member of the IAB executive committee, added that "Such political actions ... destroy the academic process, since we will no longer be able to trust the objectivity and professional detachment of academics who are involved in 'silent boycotts,' the journals they edit, and the peer review processes in which they participate."
"None of the developments in our region interest these people behind the boycott," said Professor Wistrich, an expert on anti-Semitism at Hebrew University. "This is a real obsession."
Education Minister Yuli Tamir also expressed strong criticism of the boycott motion, as did Zevulun Orlev, chair of the Knesset's Science and Technology Committee.
The Academic Friends of Israel in Britain also released a statement condemning the boycott.
"This only brings dishonor and sheer ridicule upon NATFHE which can be rightly called and remembered as a racist and discriminatory union," the statement said. The organization said it would continue its policy of exposing academics who boycott Israeli institutions and academics, and added that it believed anyone who pursues such an action is guilty of breaking discrimination and equal opportunities laws as well as university rules and their own contracts of employment.
"There are countless Palestinian and Arab collaborations with Israel in agriculture, medicine, science and many other fields, as well as burgeoning links between academics in this country and Israel," said Ronnie Fraser, director of the Academic Friends of Israel. "If the sponsors of this boycotting campaign succeeded in something, it is only to undermine further progress, collaboration and peace in the Middle East and to marginalize the standing of NATFHE, its successor union, the UCU and British academia."
The International Advisory Board for Academic Freedom (IAB) at Bar-Ilan University also expressed its deep dissatisfaction with the boycott decision.
IAB Chairman Yosef Yeshurun, provost of Bar-Ilan University, added that while pro-boycott activists were a marginal group, the majority of union members were not necessarily aware of the intricacies of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the range of political opinions on Israeli campuses, and could be personally influenced by the boycott decision in the long-term. While senior Israeli scientists would not be hurt by such decisions, he said, the results could be detrimental to young scholars.
Yeshurun also said that the IAB would budget funds for collaboration with English academics in order to encourage scientists to work against the boycott.
I believe that commercial boycotts of Israel hurt the Israelis more than the boycotting countries, since the boycotting countries generally have alternative sources of goods (too bad the Israelis don't export oil).
On the other hand, the dynamic is different with academic boycotts. I suspect they are generally proposed by leftists in disciplines outside the sciences, who don't have many collaborations with Israelis in the first place. However, the scientists in the boycotting countries realize that they, on the other hand, have a great deal to lose, since they have a lot of collaborations with Israeli scientists, because of the high quality of Israeli science and technology. I think that this is where the pushback comes from.
The good news keeps on comin'...:)
Time for reprisals. Jews in publishing, media, politics, commerce and science should blacklist every single academic who tok part in this despicable cabal.
bttt
Dishonor, yes, but I fear it won't bring nearly enough ridicule.
---------------------------
They know they can't do jack-all without our brains; as simple as that. :)
College Education Ping list.
Let JamesP81, McVey, or REpublicanprofessor know if you want on or off this ping list.
Thanks, it's the first time I've seen anything.
I asked once to be taken off this list, and I was told that it would happen. Apparently it didn't, so I'll ask again. Please take me off the list. Thanks.
I second your motion and advise all persons who support Israel to let the institutions of "higher learning" know they are on probation as far as support is concerned. I realize the organization is independent of particular institutions but the schools can bring pressure to bear upon academics who, like celebrities, seem to revel in cashing meaningless votes on issues about which they have little real knowledge.
Too many organizations have been hijacked by liberals who want to use the organization as a power base to further their private agendas. It has happened with the NEA, the AMA, the APA and the ABA here in the United States, not to mention several of the labor unions. Such organizations are just cutting their own throats to involve themselves in political matters in which their own members are often sharply divided. Stupid move on its part.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.