If I'm wrong, then show me where. Show me where there's a shortfall in my logic.
You won't, of course, because you can't. All you can do is make a bald assertion that I'm "dead wrong," with zero discussion, with zero engagement of any of the points I made, and utterly without proof. This is precisely the same tactic liberals use.
Having seen your posts here before, I assumed you were a pretty good guy. Obviously, I was wrong.
If the truth upsets you, there are other websites where that is no impediment. As for my comments, if you don't like my peaches, don't shake my tree.
Truth doesn't upset me. I will confess, though, that I have little tolerance for ignorant jerks who respond to a cordial invitation to a thread by advising me to "Read The F*****g Constitution."
There's no reason to "discuss" this subject, any more than there's a need to "discuss" gravity.
Obviously, a lot of people on this thread think you're wrong. But Congressman Billybob knows better, because he's Congressman Billybob. And if you don't like Congressman Billybob's OPINION, presented utterly without any justification whatsoever, then "Read The F*****g Constitution."
Incidentally, a lot of physicists would find quite ample reason to discuss gravity. But that's a minor point.
P.S. I don't seek the support of people who can't read and/or don't like the Constitution.
Since you're not likely to get the support of those like myself who do, then if I were you, I wouldn't quit my day job.
Incidentally, I'm glad someone appointed you the Grand Policeman of which topics may and may not be discussed on FreeRepublic. Can I see your badge, please?
Billybob,
Aside from pointing out that I incorrectly read the length of time that a person may serve as President, no one has yet found any significant fault with my analysis.
If you're intellectually capable, then do so. And if you can't demonstrate that I'm absolutely wrong and an utter idiot in my reasoning, then apologize for your arrogance and rudeness.