Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: only1percent; kabar

Sorry, I stand corrected. You guys are correct. Ten years at most.


90 posted on 06/12/2006 6:12:28 PM PDT by Luke Skyfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: Luke Skyfreeper

Okay, then amend all of my previous statements: the framers of the 22nd Amendment intended a 10-year limit.

This, incidentally, weakens the notion that someone who has served 2 terms already has necessarily "reached the limit" according to the intent of the framers of the 22nd Amendment.

That would make it more likely that the USSC would fail to find such a candidate for Vice-President constitutionally ineligible.


91 posted on 06/12/2006 6:15:47 PM PDT by Luke Skyfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson