Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CAWats

Would this also apply to New York City, since the State of New York allows the sale and posession of hand guns.


22 posted on 06/12/2006 7:31:58 PM PDT by moonman (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: moonman

I would assume so; but this is NY...


23 posted on 06/12/2006 7:34:11 PM PDT by CAWats (And I will make no distinction between terrorists and the democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: moonman

California has a preemption clause, which reserves the authority to regulate firearms to the state alone. Some cities have violated it in the past.


25 posted on 06/12/2006 7:37:29 PM PDT by tarator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: moonman
Would this also apply to New York City, since the State of New York allows the sale and posession of hand guns.

If NY state has a preemption law, and no "home rule" provision in their state Constitution, and you could get the NY Supreme Court to take such a case.. maybe... don't hold your breath.

Besides, even New York state laws are abominable, including as they do a ban on ugly militia guns.

69 posted on 06/13/2006 9:07:53 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson