Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ontos-on

"I heard Ann on Rusty Humphreys last night and she said she was not appearing with Carlin because for their was no point in her debating a professional comedian."

- Subsequent posters don't seem to get the point that Anne was making. She uses sarcasm to deflate self important liberal elitists and make them look silly. She has to play off of their pomposity and indignation to score points.
Carlin also uses sarcasm, is not pompous and too cool to show indignation. So their debate would be a dual of, "can you top this" funny one liners and he, being a professional comedian who has tested his delivery of one liners before many audiences, would win such a meeting.


47 posted on 06/13/2006 6:57:05 AM PDT by finnigan2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: finnigan2

Yes, but would be worse is for Carlin to appear after Ann...in the event she doesn't remain...and have him zing her repeatedly to the cheers of the morons in the audience.


49 posted on 06/13/2006 7:15:43 AM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: finnigan2

I don't know if many have seen Carlin on political shows but he is 10 times more nasty and viscous than Michael Moore.


58 posted on 06/13/2006 1:06:35 PM PDT by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson