Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter and the Myth of Liberal Tolerance
The American Thinker ^ | June 13, 2006 | Marc Sheppard

Posted on 06/13/2006 5:41:32 AM PDT by Quilla

 

In the very first chapter of her 2002 book, Slander: Liberal Lies About The American Right, Ann Coulter exposed the duplicitous character of those who “demand[ed] campus speech codes, an end to ‘intolerance,’ and ‘hate speech’ laws” while continually bearing-down on a single target when attacking conservative women – their appearance.  Now that Ms. Coulter’s latest book, ‘Godless: The Church of Liberalism, and her defense thereof on numerous television appearances, has put the author, herself, in the cross-hairs of the left, can her personal evisceration be anything less than assured?

In her own prescient words, Coulter described the treatment liberals extend to their female adversaries:

“More than any of their other hate speech, the left’s attacks on women for being ugly tell you everything.  There is nothing so irredeemably cruel as an attack on a woman for her looks.”

She then points out that the women constantly being called ugly are not Maxine Waters, Chelsea Clinton, Janet Reno or Madeline Albright.  No, the party of inclusion, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, tolerance and Bella Abzug instead target the likes of Paula Jones, Linda Tripp and Katherine Harris.  From Slander:

Journalists have called Linda Tripp ‘Barracudaville,’ smelling of ‘gunpowder and garlic,’’ugly and evil,’ and Howard Stern in a Fright Wig,’’a snitch and an ugly one at that.

Exemplifying the innumerable attacks upon her appearance, Newsweek’s Evan Thomas had referred  to Jones as “some sleazy woman with big hair coming out of the trailer parks …” Superbly researched, in-depth commentary, indeed.

Additionally, as Coulter points out, referring to Ms. Harris:

“Even polished, wealthy, Harvard educated, attractive women will be attacked for their looks if they get in the Democrats’ way.”

In her December 1, 2000 article, “Liberals’ Art of Trashing of Women,” Marianne M. Jennings writes:

“Katherine Harris, Florida’s secretary of state, who dared halt county election boards’ Carnac routines to divine votes, has brought out the liberals’ caustic best. She has not only seized late-night comics’ insults, she has earned mainstream press bashing. The Boston Herald described her as ‘looking just ghastly.’ The Washington Post wrote Mrs. Harris, ‘seems to have applied her makeup with a trowel.’”

How marvelous is it, then, that when Coulter decides to comment on a particular group of New Jersey 9/11 widows and the previously sacrosanct subject of the women using their grief “to make a political point”, such devices would, ultimately, be turned against her?

Margaret Nagel, writing for the Huffington Post:

“But because she could be considered in some circles attractive ( if you like the dyed blond, anorexic type – which some men in America clearly do) she is continually given a platform on show after show to vent her twisted views on our world and not be challenged or seen as the heartless narcissist that she is.”

On the June 9, 2006 edition of MSNBC’s Countdown with Keith Olbermann, the self-indulgent host discussed the “Jersey Girls” situation with Democratic political analyst, Lawrence O’Donnell.  O’Donnell was bloviating on how the Democrats would love for Coulter to step forward and become the Michael Moore of the right, but that she hasn’t quite made it “up to the Michael Moore level.”  The snooty Olbermann responded with:

“It’s kind of an uneven fight there. She’s not as talented as Michael Moore and she’s not as attractive.”

Cutting-edge analysis, Keith! Do you suppose Olbermann had ever paused to comment on how Hillary’s choice of pants-suits often make her thighs appear chubby when asked to assess a Rodham Clinton political address?

Another disturbing ploy of the “tolerant” liberals is to question Ann’s sexuality.  Steven Leser at OpEdNews.com typifies this particularly vile tactic:

“Then again, there is that persistent rumor in the liberal blogosphere about Ann being a man in drag on account of her prominent Adam’s apple and masculine writing style. Maybe the prison entry physical will produce a ‘shocking’ discovery. Can you imagine a tranny that looks like Ann being sent to men’s prison?”

Putting aside the blatant absurdity and sordid implications of these remarks, Mr. Leser would appear to be as confused about his identity, political, as his words would suggest Ms. Coulter is about hers, sexual.  After all, is it not the politically-correct brigade of the left whose globe-improving missions include convincing the world that homosexuality, transsexuality,  and any other deviant conduct ending in those same nine letters is, in fact, perfectly normal?

Why then, do we find viscous personal attacks annexed to virtually all condemnations of Ann Coulter’s thoughts and words?  Perhaps she, herself, explains it best:

“Liberals need not bother with logical persuasion as long as they can prey on people’s sense of weakness.”

Most pathetically of all, while researching his Sean Penn fluff piece, cynically yet appropriately titled “Citizen Penn,” author John Lahr noticed “a plastic Barbie-like doll propped against the fireplace.”  Penn explained it to be “An Ann Coulter Doll” and that “We violate her.  There are cigarette burns in some funny areas.” 

Sorrowfully, such a disquieting and cowardly practice epitomizes the elite left’s intellectual response to a woman who dares put their actions, language, ideologies and, yes, tolerance to the test whenever she speaks or writes.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; godless; leftists; liberals; loons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last
Playin' by the rules.


1 posted on 06/13/2006 5:41:35 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Quilla

Bookmark bump...


2 posted on 06/13/2006 5:42:52 AM PDT by 69ConvertibleFirebird (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I'm making this suggestion on every Coulter thread that I'm lucky to get into early on.

1. Go to your local Craig's List "Rants and Raves" section and post something positive about Annie.

2. Get cussed at and insulted.

3. Nuke the librat Annie hater in combat debate.

4. Watch the librat act like a three-year-old.

5. Repeat.

This is how I spend my free time. They're so humorous when they lose.
(BTW, that "Rants and Raves" isn't safe for work. LOTS of profanity, especially after I post there.)


3 posted on 06/13/2006 5:46:47 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

What is Craig's List "Rants and Raves"?


4 posted on 06/13/2006 5:48:07 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

I have bought her book now just to spite the drive by media and to thwart their religious goals.


5 posted on 06/13/2006 5:51:27 AM PDT by Notwithstanding (I love my German shepherd - Benedict XVI reigns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost

You can probably get there through the links from where I post. Click here and find your city:
http://denver.craigslist.org/


6 posted on 06/13/2006 5:51:30 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

Why do you think I always put the word "liberal" in quotes.

"Liberals" are anything but.

They're all smug, arrogant, condescending and self-righteous fascist totalitarians.


7 posted on 06/13/2006 5:51:52 AM PDT by garyhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Will someone please feed this beautiful women... She's definately the prettiest pencil I've ever seen!

Ann, a doughnut every once and a while is good for the soul!

8 posted on 06/13/2006 5:52:31 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Words Mean Things...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

You are right,that is fun :) but only for a short time, oh my blood pressure! My personal favorites are those that cannot spell the curse words they heap upon me. LOL


9 posted on 06/13/2006 5:53:18 AM PDT by D1X1E (Ever wonder if you make a difference in the world? Marines don't have that problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
She then points out that the women constantly being called ugly are not Maxine Waters, Chelsea Clinton, Janet Reno or Madeline Albright.

They are here. And they indeed are all ugly but what relevance does it have? Especially Chelsea Clinton, she's not even a political person that I am aware of and she didn't choose her parents.

I occasionally pile on too with the "ugly" comments but then I just click my screen name and look at my picture and tell myself, "Hey, you're not going to win any beauty contests either".

10 posted on 06/13/2006 5:54:15 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garyhope
"They're all smug, arrogant, condescending and self-righteous fascist totalitarians."

Now, now. We aren't allowed to say anything bad about the totalitarian swine.

At least that's the opinion of the infililtrators and nitwits around.

11 posted on 06/13/2006 5:54:33 AM PDT by Reactionary (The Barking of the Native Moonbat is the Sound of Moral Nitwittery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: D1X1E

Oh, I've been addicted to it for a week now.
You should see 'em when I post my bumperstickers. Especially today.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v212/aaargoxx/bumperstickers/roverumsfeldcomplete2.gif


12 posted on 06/13/2006 5:56:49 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Most pathetically of all, while researching his Sean Penn fluff piece, cynically yet appropriately titled “Citizen Penn,” author John Lahr noticed “a plastic Barbie-like doll propped against the fireplace.” Penn explained it to be “An Ann Coulter Doll” and that “We violate her. There are cigarette burns in some funny areas.”

How pathetic! And how pathetic does that make Penn and Company?

As for Olbermann, he gives Moore a run for the money in the avoirdupois department.

13 posted on 06/13/2006 5:56:52 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
on account of her prominent Adam’s apple and masculine writing style.

Huh ?

14 posted on 06/13/2006 5:58:08 AM PDT by floozy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
We've done our fair share of commentary of this woman's looks:

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

15 posted on 06/13/2006 6:02:08 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla; All
“ ...the women constantly being called ugly are not Maxine Waters, Chelsea Clinton, Janet Reno or Madeline Albright.”

That jab alone... should propel your fannies to Barne & Noble.

16 posted on 06/13/2006 6:03:51 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Cutting-edge analysis, Keith! Do you suppose Olbermann had ever paused to comment on how Hillary’s choice of pants-suits often make her thighs appear chubby when asked to assess a Rodham Clinton political address?

Ummm .. I don't think the pantsuits are to blame

17 posted on 06/13/2006 6:04:32 AM PDT by Mo1 (DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
Penn explained it to be “An Ann Coulter Doll” and that “We violate her. There are cigarette burns in some funny areas.”
How pathetic! And how pathetic does that make Penn and Company?

And how telling about the sick minds of the left. They find it amusing to simulate violation and abuse of women?
18 posted on 06/13/2006 6:09:18 AM PDT by D1X1E (Ever wonder if you make a difference in the world? Marines don't have that problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: randita

Yes and would be called on that fact by the libs but they can't see the irony when they do the same.


19 posted on 06/13/2006 6:15:55 AM PDT by D1X1E (Don't hold a protest sign in my face then try to tell me you support the troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth

"Ann, a doughnut every once and a while is good for the soul!"

I second that! I think Ann is very pretty, and has a razor sharp insight. But I like a woman to have some curves not sharp angles.

I also think she slipped on the NJ women thing. I think she went over the top. She's right, as usual, but a touch on the insensitive side.


20 posted on 06/13/2006 6:29:01 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird
More than any of their other hate speech, the left’s attacks on women for being ugly tell you everything. There is nothing so irredeemably cruel as an attack on a woman for her looks.

I've been complaining about this tendency for years...unfortunately it's some of my fellow Freepers who are guilty. I daresay if you tune into just about any Hillary thread, you won't get far before the "She so ugly" comments show up. Ditto any liberal woman.

I'm going to use the above Anne Coulter quote from now on to bolster my argument against this childish practice.

21 posted on 06/13/2006 6:39:34 AM PDT by poindexter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
She's right, as usual, but a touch on the insensitive side

Of course, being sensitive actually wasn't fixing the problem, was it? I think this may just break down the barriers protecting liberal victim mongers from criticism.

22 posted on 06/13/2006 6:40:44 AM PDT by outlawcam (No time to waste. Now get moving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

What adam's apple???


23 posted on 06/13/2006 6:40:46 AM PDT by 3catsanadog (When anything goes, everything does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

The suggestion or attempt by New Jersey to ban Ann's book may very well be a precursor of what to expect if the Democrats take over the Congress. Democrats are leftist socialist revolutionaries so that would be no surprise.

The four Jersey women became millionaires as a result of their husband's deaths. They have chosen to become activists as though they were representing all widows and widowers as a result of 9/11. They are fair game in the political area. Going around stinking up the country with their unsubstantiated claims and charges against the current administration just serves to demonstrate their ignorance of the political process and their disdain for other victims of 9/11 who disagree with their assessments, IMHO.


24 posted on 06/13/2006 6:42:32 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: outlawcam

"I think this may just break down the barriers protecting liberal victim mongers from criticism."

That is possible. If so, she once again proves she's smarter than I am.


25 posted on 06/13/2006 6:43:14 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
That is possible. If so, she once again proves she's smarter than I am.

LOL

26 posted on 06/13/2006 6:46:46 AM PDT by outlawcam (No time to waste. Now get moving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: poindexter
OK. Show me a pretty liberal woman with a nice, accommodating, pleasant attitude towards life and conservatives. 8<)
27 posted on 06/13/2006 6:49:03 AM PDT by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: D1X1E
Spicoli needs to get a life!
28 posted on 06/13/2006 6:49:25 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Show me a pretty liberal woman with a nice, accommodating, pleasant attitude towards life and conservatives.

Hmmmm..... I'm thinking......

29 posted on 06/13/2006 6:50:06 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

Every criticism of Ann's comments about the Jersey girls has come from a critic who has not read her words and does not know what she wrote.


30 posted on 06/13/2006 6:52:23 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (Here come I, gravitas in tow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

The libs need to be attacked in a direct fashion. And Ann is the point of the spear. An even more direct strategy is to confront the libs regarding their hate driven prejudicial stereotyping. There is nothing intellectually honest about the libs protestations.

Their hate -affair with GWB is telling and illustrative. Even an incurably incompetent GWB would have stumbled by chance onto some correct actions. But the perverse hate spewing left can never acknowledge even the most modest of intelligent human traits to someone they have worked so hard at demonizing and de-humanizing.

It is truly a terrifying display of raw hatred that we are witnessing. It is not rational. It is at it's root...pathological. It is precisely the kind of hatred that spawns murder and genocide. It is a hatred brewed up inside of a person intended to alleviate a deep inner ache. A dark inner wound. And once this hatred finds it's target it will not yield to logic or reason. It will relentlessly pursue it's target and revel in it's merciless and brutal destruction. Perhaps that's the deep root of kinship the libs and Islamonazis share. Lets face it, there is some kind of chemistry there. It may not have been love at first sight but I can see those two groups enjoying one big night of unified bawdy celebration at the news of GWB's demise.

GWB is the personification of everything hated in our post-modern world. He is a traditionalist. He is a man. He is a Christian. He is a Texan. He is a capitalist. And he is unapologetic.

Ultimately that is all that matters. He is guilty by design as are all of us who share any of those characteristics. GWB presents the perfect storm of personal qualities that makes him unworthy of not only the presidency, but life it's self. He pushes the nuclear destruct buttons of the liberal mind simply by speaking, by breathing, by being. He and his kind cannot and will not be tolerated by the tolerance set.

It is only through his destruction that they can affirm their humanity.

So to argue or debate these people on this or that issue is to honor their motivations and respect their intentions far more than they deserve. They have no intention of entering into a partnership of equals resulting in shared values and compromise. We are the enemy and their very lives depend on our defeat. Not the defeat of Islamonazis. Not the defeat of poverty, crime, racism, intolerance and ignorance.

In the simplistic hate filled mind of the modern lib all the ills of the world will suddenly dissolve when men and women like GWB cease to exists or at the very least are exiled to the back of life's bus. Placed as far from the controls as is necessary to insure we have no influence. And if we don't learn and accept our place, force will be quick and severe.

So Ann is the spear. She is placing a dagger directly in the heart of the demon by speaking the truth. And the demon is gnashing and thrashing about while the pretty frail blonde girl unflinchingly stares into the bowels of Hell. Reminds me of that scene from the exorcist. All the demons hysterically screaming and threatening and wailing...cause they know they've been found out and they've met their match.


31 posted on 06/13/2006 6:57:49 AM PDT by Awgie (truth is always stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Show me a pretty liberal woman with a nice, accommodating, pleasant attitude towards life and conservatives.

“More than any of their other hate speech, the left’s attacks on women for being ugly tell you everything. There is nothing so irredeemably cruel as an attack on a woman for her looks.” Ann Coulter

We weren't talking about attitude.

32 posted on 06/13/2006 6:58:43 AM PDT by poindexter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Everything I ever needed to know about liberals, I've learned from living in Seattle.

As a generalization, they are smug, hateful, spiteful, smarmy jerks who believe anyone who disagrees with them is a fascist idiot that doesn't deserve a voice in their precious Church Of The Tolerance State.

I've met my share of right-wing lunatics whom I consider dangerous - especially here at FR, but the percentage of main-stream liberals who are a threat to everyday freedom is truly scary.

33 posted on 06/13/2006 6:58:53 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (ISLAM: The Other Psychosis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amos the Prophet

OK, I read it and I think some of the commentary was unnecessary, in particular the comment about "we don't know if their husbands were going to divorce them".

However, her point about them holding up their loss as a shield against criticism and using it to lambaste this administration and any other conservative was certainly dead on target.


34 posted on 06/13/2006 7:13:47 AM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: randita

Yes, but everything we say about Helen Thomas is true. And even if she became a Republican conservative tomorrow...everything we say about Helen Thomas' looks will still be true.


35 posted on 06/13/2006 7:14:22 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

The truth hurts, even when it's funny. Ann tells the unvarnished truth and the Libs can't take it. Kooks!


36 posted on 06/13/2006 7:17:17 AM PDT by veronica ("A person needs a sense of mission like the air he breathes...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

Liberals are only "liberal" until they get power.


37 posted on 06/13/2006 7:18:08 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 3catsanadog
The Ann haters are so petty, childish, yet vicious.

They accuse her of being a man, being too skinny (as if that's a sin), or wearing pointy shoes :). That's the best they can come up with. Losers...:)

38 posted on 06/13/2006 7:19:46 AM PDT by veronica ("A person needs a sense of mission like the air he breathes...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: garyhope

May I suggest you precede the term with so-called, like they do with partial birth abortion?


39 posted on 06/13/2006 7:25:21 AM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cinives

OK, I read it and I think some of the commentary was unnecessary, in particular the comment about "we don't know if their husbands were going to divorce them".

_________________________

You ever been married to a harpie?


40 posted on 06/13/2006 7:33:26 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (Here come I, gravitas in tow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Playin' by the rules.

More like Sinking To Their Level.

I am sorry, folks. I agree with Coulter's substance 85% of the time, but I can't agree that there is a net gain in the way she deliberately taunts to draw leftist fire to demonstrate how easy it is to make them violate their own principles.

Take her Jersey Girls statement in the book. I was in a bookstore yesterday and read it in context, and Matt Lauer did a serviceable job blowing it out of proportion. Coulter's remark about the JG's 'enjoying' their husbands deaths was part of a much larger point. She spent several pages discussing the kid glove treatment of the likes of 9/11 widow Kristin Breitweiser -- who blamed Bush Administration figures for the deaths of that day repeatedly to the exclusion of the terrorists -- as opposed to Debra Burlingame, who also organized surviving family members for media fights, but was marginalized and insulted by the New York Times editorial page when she fiercely fought against the placing of a pan-cultural Blame America First museum on the Ground Zero grave of her husband.

There is no doubt that Coulter has a valid point: There is a liberal tendency to send authentically tragic but self-serving, intellectually dishonest spokespersons like Breitweiser, Cindy Sheehan and Michael Berg out before cameras and microphones, hoping they will inspire in fence-sitting observers their same distrust of everyone and everything right of center. But Dorothy Rabinowitz, an excellent Wall Street Journal writer who years previously broke the major print media embargo on Juanita Broaddrick's allegation of rape against Bill Clinton, wrote a lengthy treatise on the Jersey Girls that made the same point, but didn't come close to suggesting that they were somehow delighted they had traded their spouses for celebrity.

Rabinowitz, however, wasn't invited on Today or put on the cover of Time. Why not? IMHO, because the left-leaners who run those outlets didn't see any benefit in promoting someone whose opposing view did nothing but make sense. No, they needed someone who would be seen not as a counterbalance, but as an wild-eyed, scattershot display of the reasons why nobody but they in the MSM should be taken seriously. Enter Ann.

Haven't some of you Coulter Cheerleaders wondered why she gets more ink and face time than conservative females like Mona Charen, a pre-Reagan revolution columnist whose book Useful Idiots was everything Treason should have been, or Laura Ingraham, a former CBS News reporter and nationally syndicated talk show host? I believe it is because Coulter can be counted on to deliver a foot in the mouth spew that makes the less attentive say, "If you have to be that cruel/silly/tactless to be a conservative, I don't want to be one."

I speak from experience regarding that idea. Before the age of Rush, the only guys I read, heard or saw representing conservatism on a regular basis were the caustic columnist Jeffrey White, John Lofton, and Wally George/Morton Downey Jr. (same act, different coasts). Eventually, the more I learned, the more rightward I drifted -- no thanks to those guys.

41 posted on 06/13/2006 7:36:27 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee (New popular baby names for daughters of liberals: Fallujah, Haditha, Murtha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

You are correct. Freepers are frequently guilty of the same thing. Just look at the comments on Helen Thomas. There is plenty of substance on which to comment, with the attacks on her appearance.


42 posted on 06/13/2006 7:43:20 AM PDT by knuthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny
"I've met my share of right-wing lunatics whom I consider dangerous - especially here at FR..."

Remind me never to flood your inbox with pictures of Hillary and Bill in North Korea.

Okay?

43 posted on 06/13/2006 7:45:05 AM PDT by Reactionary (The Barking of the Native Moonbat is the Sound of Moral Nitwittery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: knuthom
There is plenty of substance on which to comment, with the attacks on her appearance.

That should have read "without the attacks on her appearance

44 posted on 06/13/2006 7:45:12 AM PDT by knuthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: garyhope

You're right and I actually do use "so called" when I refer to "so called-liberals" many times. If I must.


45 posted on 06/13/2006 7:45:52 AM PDT by garyhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Amos the Prophet

yes - in male form. It's equally bad. Life got much better when he decided to split.

I understand your point but what we don't know is, were their political views the same as their husbands, ie might their husbands have approved of their use of this opportunity ? I sure don't know and I'm pretty sure Ann doesn't either.

That said, nothing Ann wrote detracted from the truth of her observation about unasssailable spokesmen from the left.


46 posted on 06/13/2006 7:52:55 AM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: outlawcam

Sensitivity is just another word for political correctness, the breastwork the Jersey Girls hide behind. Strip them of that protection and they are exposed as the shrill, anti-American harpies that they are. We're at war and these people are as much the enemy as bin Laden. Nice does not win wars or insure security. Ask the Canadians.


47 posted on 06/13/2006 8:04:16 AM PDT by Dionysius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee

I imagine there were a lot of military people during WWII who said many of the same types of things you are when the idea of the now infamous Dirty Dozen came up.

Fortunately, the Dirty Dozen did their thing in spite of the detractors. We were lucky to have them and have much to thank them for.

In much the same way Coulter has taken on a job that many have attempted, though few have made much progress.

She's out there in the muck, where the others were afraid to go. With great gusto she's taking bullets and it looks like shes getting the job done.

Like the Dirty Dozen, we're lucky to have her and have much to thank her for.


48 posted on 06/13/2006 8:07:47 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

Bump for later reading.


49 posted on 06/13/2006 8:08:14 AM PDT by thirst4truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth

I hurt my back a long time ago...I like em light.


50 posted on 06/13/2006 8:11:39 AM PDT by TET1968 (SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson