Skip to comments.The Transformation of John Mackey (Whole Foods CEO from leftist to capitalist)
Posted on 06/13/2006 11:55:52 AM PDT by Marxbites
I've been there, so the things that John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods Market, says in the June 2006 issue of Liberty magazine essentially ring true.
Whole Foods is big now, one of the nation's fastest growing mass retailers, with sales last year exceeding $5 billion and a gross profit of more than $1.6 billion not a bad return in the grocery business.
It didn't start that way. Coming out of the counterculture movement of the 1960s and 1970s, Mackey, a vegetarian, a former long-haired and bearded commune resident, a student of ecology, yoga and eastern philosophy, writes that he idealistically opened a small, food store in 1978 with his girlfriend, with a total capital outlay of $45,000. The store lost $23,000 in its first year.
His philosophy at the time, he explains, wasn't exactly pro-profit or pro-capitalist: "Politically, I drifted to the Left and embraced the ideology that business and corporations were essentially 'evil' because they sought profits. I believed that government was 'good' (if the 'right' people had control of it) because it altruistically worked for the public interest."
He'd been taught, Mackey explains, that "business and capitalism were based on exploitation: exploitation of consumers, workers, society and the environment." After a year in business, he saw a reality that didn't mesh with his decades of anti-business indoctrination.
"I believed that 'profit' was a necessary evil at best and certainly not a desirable goal for society as a whole," he writes. "However, becoming an entrepreneur completely changed my life. Everything I believed about business was proven to be wrong."
Rather than seeing a milieu of "exploitation" and coercion in his store, Mackey saw a system of freedom and "voluntary cooperation" at work and a new realism: "No one is forced to trade with a business; customers have competitive alternatives in the marketplace; employees have competitive alternatives for their labor; investors have different alternatives and places to invest their capital. Investors, labor, management, suppliers they all need to cooperate to create value for their customers."
In short, an entrepreneur like Harvard dropout and Microsoft founder Bill Gates (or John Mackey) got his money first and foremost by creating a new pie, by launching an innovative enterprise with new products that created new wealth and income that spread to investors, labor, management, suppliers and spread to the public at large by way of increased tax revenues.
"In other words, business is not a zero-sum game with a winner and a loser," says Mackey. "It is a win, win, win, win game."
That's not the way Mackey's customers and employees saw it. Despite losing half his initial investment in the first year of business, Mackey was nevertheless accused of greed and exploitation. "Our customers thought our prices were too high, our employees thought they were underpaid, the vendors would not give us large discounts, the community was forever clamoring for donations, and the government was slapping us with endless fees, licenses, fines and taxes."
Mackey has voted straight Libertarian since those early days in 1980. Still, he says he's had little success in converting people to the concept of economic freedom or to an understanding of how the world really works, to the concept of how freedom, prosperity, human progress, spontaneous order and overall well-being are inherently channeled through a system of voluntary cooperation, private property, business competition and individual incentives.
"The freedom movement remains a small, relatively unimportant movement in the United States today," he writes. "As a businessman who knows something about marketing and branding, I can tell you the freedom movement is branding itself very poorly."
By incorrect branding, Mackey means that too much emphasis about individual freedom has been focused on side issues, such as the legalization of drugs, and not enough on the big picture. Instead, he maintains, if it's to have any chance of having a mass appeal, the freedom movement will have to consciously create a broad and inspiring vision, an idealism that addresses the direct correlation between economic freedom and societal progress.
The freedom movement, libertarians, and free market economists, he writes, have done a poor job of defending the social legitimacy of business, economic freedom, capitalism, individualism and free markets. The message should be that business, working through free markets, has arguably been the world's greatest force for human progress and our collective well-being, delivering increased prosperity, less poverty, extended longevity and democratic freedoms.
Ralph R. Reiland, the B. Kenneth Simon professor of free enterprise at Robert Morris University in Pittsburgh. Send him mail. Comment on the blog.
I thought he was a Hall of Fame TE with the Baltimore Colts.
Good read, thanks.
"Coming out of the counterculture movement of the 1960s and 1970s, Mackey, a vegetarian, a former long-haired and bearded commune resident, a student of ecology, yoga and eastern philosophy..."
He used to be a hippie; then he grew up.
Except for the ones cloistered away from reality in government, universities, or the entertainment industry, they mostly all did.
Hmmm... A thirty-two per cent return on sales.
If the oil industry has a 9.5% return on sales, then this has to be price gouging! I demand a Congressional investigation.
Any man who is under 30 and is not a Liberal has no heart;
any man who is over 30 and not a Conservative has no brains.
I, too, voted Libertarian in the '80s. Indeed, I was a Libertarian candidate in more than one election.
Then I realized that the central idea of a free society is not misunderstood at all - in fact, it is not desired by a population conditioned by government institutions.
Orwell might as well have stayed a policeman in Burma.
Simple and brilliant. Glad to have Mackey on our team.
It's too damn bad that all of us his/our age haven't.
Whole Foods owner is a Libertarian? Who'd a thunk? I am shocked, I'll go there more often.
And he also puts his charity money where his mouth is... but I still like Central Market better (Texans will know what I'm talking about).
So true, so true... John Mackey may be right that aggressive marketing might change this by changing peoples beliefs and perceptions, but I see it as a lost cause... the vast majority of people don't care about freedom, they only want security-- physical, economic, social... Sad thing is you can see this right here on FR every day.
That's true, but the key is to get the top 5% who stand to benefit most to always remember it. Libertarians don't have to win elections as long as they can influence the best and brightest. Most of the public, on the left and right, is always going to vote for the demagogue who promises to give them free stuff and punish people they don't like. But if the politician who emplyes such tactics also needs campaign contributions from the clear-minded libertarian business man, the ideas will still triumph.
"The freedom movement remains a small, relatively unimportant movement in the United States today," he writes. "As a businessman who knows something about marketing and branding, I can tell you the freedom movement is branding itself very poorly."Ping-a-ling.
Very succinct explanation of the socialist mind set. I wonder if he ever read Ayn Rand's 'Atlas Shrugged'?
Brainwashed it is.
Our self interested educrats should be horsewhipped or hung for treason for 100 years of their lies.
A recent poll indicates the average adult can't name all three branches of his own Govt - just they way Govt likes it, as Donald Luskin propounds and exsposes in his excellent blog http://www.poorandstupid.com/chronicle.asp
And here are some great links - the ones educrats would destroy if they only could. These will bring anyone up to speed re: the progressive's hijacking of our constitution for elite benefit at taxpayer expense.
Taking money back (completely logical and constitutional)
How Progressives Rewrote the Constitution (video)
The Issue of Tariffs: How U.S. Revenue Collection Was Turned Inside-Out (video)
Size Matters: How Big Government Puts the Squeeze on America's Families, Finances, and Freedom And Limits the Pursuit of Happiness (video)
Big Business and the Rise of American Statism (exc essay)
The Founding of The Federal Reserve (video)
The Great Depression, World War II, and American Prosperity, Part I (video)
Secrets of the Federal Reserve (the web of power is phenominal)
Jackson's 2nd Bank US VETO (very important - what he correctly and constitutionally opposed is just what we ended up with in 1913)
"The Separation of Commercial and Investment Banking: The Morgans vs. the Rockefellers" (the true thieves of the taxpayers and obsconders of the const)
Now he's selling groceries. ;^)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.