Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Past Your Eyes
I'm a 42-year-old bachelor, and I agree completely with this article. I'm single because I spent my teens and 20's in churches that discouraged dating and marriage. When I finally realized how stupid these people were, I was going through a layoff and didn't get my career back on track for several years. Since that time, I've had very poor luck meeting women who were appropriate for me.

The idiots in the churches that I attended back then never would have admitted that marriage could be good for a man. They constantly prattled about how good it would be to remain single to do church stuff. Now, I look around and see myself in much worse health than guys who found the relationships that they need. Even when I appeared to be in very good health, I always felt that my situation wasn't healthy. Now, I can certainly feel in my body that things aren't working right. I realize that a bad marriage is worse than being single, but the notion that being single is as healthy as being in a good marriage is nonsense. I hope this information gets wide publicity and that others don't make the mistakes that I did.

Bill

41 posted on 06/18/2006 4:52:34 PM PDT by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WFTR
I'm single because I spent my teens and 20's in churches that discouraged
dating and marriage.


It's little consolation, but you aren't alone.
I went through a good church-affiliated college in the late 1970s.
The senior class (the year I entered) had a marriage rate of about 75%.
By the time I exited as a senior, that metric was down to about 25%.
It was like a great dividing line.

I guess even within the realm of the church-affiliated school, the
feminist buzz and the sexual revolution convinced plenty to not
make the marriage committment as classes of years past.

Eventually many of my buddies ended up getting wives from Japan and
the Phillipines via church/missionary connections.
(Oh, and that was one wife per guy! And zero divorces in the cases of the
five buddies who went this route.)
51 posted on 06/18/2006 5:44:20 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: WFTR
I'm a 42-year-old bachelor, and I agree completely with this article.

42 is not too old. You mustn't give up. I was in a similar situation to you, and my health suffered badly, being a batchelor until 40. Now, pushing 50 I've got a wife and two kids, the youngest being a 15 month old girl. She is the light of my (entire) life.

If you have changed in such a way that you may not be attractive, change it back. You can. I did. If you are fat, lose weight. I did (90 lbs). If you are bald, embrace it and shave off the rest of your hair. If you can't attract an American woman (they do tend to be a bit neurotic) go for a foreign bride.

42 is not too old. You have nothing but time.

52 posted on 06/18/2006 5:45:15 PM PDT by lafroste (gravity is not a force. See my profile to read my novel absolutely free (I know, beyond shameless))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: WFTR

And that church would be......???? I've never heard of a church like that.


53 posted on 06/18/2006 5:56:12 PM PDT by Past Your Eyes (Every time you think, you weaken the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson