Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACLU Says Pulling The Plug On Free Speech Was The Right Call
Stop The ACLU ^ | 18-Jun-06 | John Stephenson

Posted on 06/19/2006 11:55:57 AM PDT by Jay777

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last
To: GSlob

Do you go to a football game if you don't want to be 'footballed' at?


81 posted on 06/19/2006 5:04:15 PM PDT by rvoitier ("And if talk is cheap anywhere, perhaps it is cheapest, quite frankly, in the Congress." Vitter(R-La)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance

tftp...

aclu=cookoo


82 posted on 06/19/2006 5:52:25 PM PDT by bitt ("Land of the Free, because of the Brave...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

Well thank God they didn't pull the plug on a Muslim! the ACLU would have been screaming "Free speech" from the top of their socialist little lungs!


83 posted on 06/19/2006 5:56:13 PM PDT by ladyinred (Liberals are dangerous for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

"So if she had started talking about how her faith in Mohammed and Islamic discipline had helped her and they cut her mike off, would you still be so outraged?"

Cutting off the mic in that case would never happen. If a Muslim student began that type of speech, the school leaders would be so impressed they would create a new curriculum.


84 posted on 06/19/2006 6:23:18 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (Stop the ACLU - Support the Public Expression of Religion Act 2005 - Call your congressmen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

No, I do not go to a game [and why would I pay for a ticket?]


85 posted on 06/19/2006 7:11:02 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

The ACLU would fight for her rights IF her views were as anti-christian/anti-american as theirs seem to be. I guess that they consider free-speach to only be so if it agrees with their agenda.


86 posted on 06/19/2006 8:13:12 PM PDT by FlashBack (www.teamamericapac.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jay777
You might want to take a look at the transcripts/video from the ACLU member on this morning's Fox and Friends.
I was away from the TV and the conversation went to "yellow journalism", which piqued my attention, and by the time I got back they had cut quick to commercial.
I'm going to look. I'd like to see that in print myself.
If you find you'll ping?
87 posted on 06/20/2006 4:20:49 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

If she were a Muslim, she wouldn't be valedictorian. And they certainly wouldn't cut off a Muslim's mic for fear the Muslims would cut off the head of the ACLU lawyer. Some religions just aren't into turning the other cheek.


88 posted on 06/20/2006 4:25:33 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
But I think it's also acceptable for a public school to apply a standard across the board, limiting valedictorian speeches to material which wouldn't offend any significant number of reasonable people in the community.

Welcome to America of the 21st Century where Christian speech is offensive and Christian subject matter deserves a PG-13 rating.

Last I checked there is a right to freedom of speech. There isn't a right to not be offended. Free speech wins.

89 posted on 06/20/2006 8:58:01 AM PDT by pgyanke (Christ embraces sinners; liberals embrace the sin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
For a long time, if a girl wanted to go to school in a teensy midriff-baring halter top and teensy low-rise "hot pants", the school wasn't allowed to interfere with her right to "free expression".

Finally, courts started coming around to the idea that reasonable limits on student attire were appropriate and permissible, and they should come around to that idea about ALL kinds of speech as well.

The truth of the matter is that before politically directed interference by the ACLU against public schools, those schools could always limit what they considered vulgar or inappropriate clothing, language, expression, and even attitudes that were over the top.

The leftist crowd led by extremist groups like the ACLU began to use parents and students to sue schools and school boards that did not give up on 200 years of American culture and begin to let any vulgar dressed, foul-mouthed, students spread the ACLU's anti-God political revolution to reinvent America through the government monopoly of education.

The ACLU types needed to use people for progressive lawsuits so that the leftist courts could get involved and 'walla', the leftwing revision of the public schools and the law was in place.

Students who served the left's politics, subversive intents, and anti-God revolution we not limited by the ACLU in any way. They never come out against speech that advances their leftist cause, they only sue those who stand with 200 years of American culture and morality which the ACLU fights with all its energy.

The ACLU types only began to step in if a conservative religious person spoke up with a forcefullness approaching that of the decades of anti-Christian vulgarity and leftwing politics that fights against the ACLU humanist utopia.

90 posted on 06/20/2006 10:22:04 PM PDT by OriginalIntent (Undo the ACLU's revison of the Constitution. If you agree with the ACLU revisions, you are a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: OriginalIntent
The ACLU types only began to step in if a conservative religious person spoke up with a forcefullness approaching that of the decades of anti-Christian vulgarity and leftwing politics. The ACLU wants to limit speech that fights against the ACLU humanist utopia.

Clarification: The ACLU types only begin to step in if a conservative religious person speaks up with words that run contrary to the ACLU and fights against the ACLU humanist utopia.

91 posted on 06/20/2006 10:55:06 PM PDT by OriginalIntent (Undo the ACLU's revison of the Constitution. If you agree with the ACLU revisions, you are a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson