Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It sends totally the wrong message for ministers to be spending millions of pounds of taxpayers' money on two new, official planes at a time when jobs are being cut in the NHS

Chris Grayling
Shadow transport secretary

1 posted on 06/20/2006 2:18:38 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: COEXERJ145; microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; RayChuang88; Larry Lucido; namsman; ...

Mr Blair currently uses charter
planes and the Queen's Flight

If you want on or off my aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail.

2 posted on 06/20/2006 2:20:09 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
But Labour replied that all Mr Blair's flights had been "carbon neutral" since April 2005.

Huh? They should fly a kite instead.

3 posted on 06/20/2006 2:22:39 PM PDT by ChuckShick (He's clerking for me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
British Prime Ministers are fortunate that the British public and media don't begrudge 10 Downing Street for having electricity and indoor plumbing.

This will be as well received as describing a kilt as a skirt.

5 posted on 06/20/2006 2:24:45 PM PDT by Energy Alley ("War on Christians" = just another professional victim group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
It sends totally the wrong message for ministers to be spending millions of pounds of taxpayers' money on two new, official planes at a time when jobs are being cut in the NHS

Then Recycle


6 posted on 06/20/2006 2:24:50 PM PDT by llevrok (The next "greatest generation" is now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
We are entitled to ask what the prime minister intends to do to reduce the environmental impact of his travel," he said

That's easy. He's PM. He just buys carbon credits.

8 posted on 06/20/2006 2:25:28 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative

But Labour replied that all Mr Blair's flights had been "carbon neutral" since April 2005.

Thanks to the environ'mental' global warming tards like Al Gore, we are going to have to hear about this "carbon footprint" crap for many years to come.


10 posted on 06/20/2006 2:48:13 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative

<< A spokesman for the Transport and General Workers Union, said it was "extraordinary that the prime minister should not be flying in a British-built 'plane." >>

It would be even more extraordinary if he was.

Given that generations of Britain's mobbed-up bloody unions and their gangsters-as-politician Labour Party cohorts [And, beginning with the well-known habitual drunkard and Whittle jet engine "donating" Winston Churchill, plenty of "Conservatives," too] have work-ruled and regulated once great Britain's once truly great Aircraft [And every other!] Industry completely out of existence!

Or, as anyone who regularly deals with them can attest, is it any wonder so many of Boeing's, Pratt and Whitney's and GE's et al's very best designers and engineers have British accents?


13 posted on 06/20/2006 3:37:34 PM PDT by Brian Allen (All that is required to ensure the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative

Right, right. When he heads towards the States, he should be taking a merchant ship. When he arrives here, a Greyhound to get to the White House.

Not a big carbon footprint. Just looks like a cheap ass.


15 posted on 06/20/2006 3:44:03 PM PDT by toddlintown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative

I wonder why the British government didn't snap up an ex-airline Airbus A340-200 and convert that into an executive plane. The shorter range plane would probably be an Airbus A319CJ, though.


21 posted on 06/20/2006 6:06:53 PM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson