Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sageb1

That's a good question. According to the panel on the Brit Hume report tonight, the Administration did not want to go back and visit the WMD issue. Sort of wimpy if you ask me. Another thing, the libs on the show said that these WMD were not the ones the President was talking about when he got us into this war. WMDs are WMDs. What kind of reasoning goes into what libs say?


138 posted on 06/21/2006 4:05:12 PM PDT by conservative blonde (Conservative Blonde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: conservative blonde
"...the libs on the show said that these WMD were not the ones the President was talking about when he got us into this war."

Ah, yes, the ol' backpedalling gambit..... it will be amusing to watch the various pathetic fall-back positions the libs offer now, certainly there will be no apologies for all the endless "Bush lied" diatribes. We could find countless thousands of WMD (chem and/or bio) warheads and the response would be "where are the NUKES?"
144 posted on 06/21/2006 4:10:30 PM PDT by Enchante (General Hayden: I've Never Taken a Domestic Flight That Landed in Waziristan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: conservative blonde

Seems to me loverly strategery to let Santorum run with this. He is facing a tough electoral challenge, not Bush.


160 posted on 06/21/2006 4:38:34 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson