[highimpact]

Ordnance has no "i" in it.

Wow. What a stinging rebuke. Does it make you feel superior to correct my spelling? Why didn't you answer a single question in my previous post? I guess you don't like to face the facts when they're inconvenient. For you, the History Channel is the authority.

And no, the entire explosion was not recreated under the same conditions. Never before, nor since, has a center fuel tank exploded mid-flight. Do some real research and use your critical thinking skills, and you'll realize that the entire investigation was a farce designed to fool the public into re-electing Clinton.

[U S Army EOD]

As far as explosives go and investigations of explosives, yes I am quite superior to you.

[Constantine XIII]

Well, if you are going to wander onto his playground, you should at least take care not to break the equipment. :P

[defenderSD]

Your reference to a "conclusive" documentary on the History Channel makes me laugh. It's so easy to use slanted evidence, slick presentation, and psuedoscience to convince a largely undeducated audience of anything. Then the narrator states his unproven conclusions with an air of great confidence and the audience of sheeple is thereby convinced. There were numerous major errors of omission in the investigation of TWA 800. EOD, you're also distorting the testimony of eyewitnesses who did not report seeing "streaks of light". Depending on their location, they saw one or two missiles traveling up to and striking the jetliner.

I'm concerned by the intensity with which some people here want to clear the Clinton Administration of any wrongdoing in this case. What is the motive for this intense effort that I've seen by a few posters on this site?