Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SirLinksalot
A specific example of this is Gore’s acknowledgement that 30 percent of global CO2 emissions come from wood fires used for cooking (p. 227).

Which has zero net effect on CO2 content in the atmosphere.

All the CO2 released to the atmosphere when wood either burns or decays was taken out of the atmosphere when the tree grew.

9 posted on 06/22/2006 10:15:37 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DuncanWaring
All the CO2 released to the atmosphere when wood either burns or decays was taken out of the atmosphere when the tree grew.

Right. So putting it back into the atmosphere by any means other than the natural order of nature would have a positive effect, not a net zero effect.

Net zero means that trees are sucking up that CO2 and hanging onto it. Burning them prevents that second part from happening.

24 posted on 06/22/2006 10:32:09 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson