Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Unnamed intel officials trying to put down the story. Are they fully informed and providing accurate info or is this the "revenge of the Clintonistas"??? Even if what this article reports is accurate, there is much more that needs to be understood about this issue and it's far from over.
1 posted on 06/22/2006 12:50:42 PM PDT by Enchante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: Enchante

More backstabbing by the CIA.


2 posted on 06/22/2006 12:52:17 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Memo to GOP: Don't ask me for any more money until you secure our Southern border.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

They could still be used as IED's couldn't they?


3 posted on 06/22/2006 12:52:33 PM PDT by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

The report which was declassified says that the weapons pose a threat to the region.

And the reporter really didn't do their homework so freeper jveritas has done it for him.

UNSCOM says that WMD in canisters is still viable and danger even beyond 12 years of storage.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1653841/posts


4 posted on 06/22/2006 12:53:30 PM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

This question was just asked of Rummy...whether these kinds of weapons could harm our troops when/if found in Iraq.

Rummy said, with Gen. Casey next to him...that YES, our troops would be in danger from them.


5 posted on 06/22/2006 12:53:30 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

AP and 'unnamed sources' are pretty much the same

story tellers


8 posted on 06/22/2006 12:55:43 PM PDT by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

WTF?? Too old to use? We are destroying stockpiles that go back to WWII and WWI today.. while there potentcy may not be what it once was... I guranatee you, you don't want to be around when a WWI mustard gas shell goes off.


10 posted on 06/22/2006 12:56:09 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante
Old or not, I'm glad they are out of potential circulation.

GE
11 posted on 06/22/2006 12:56:22 PM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

no evidence that any element of the
Iraqi insurgency has possession of chemical weapons

12 posted on 06/22/2006 12:56:40 PM PDT by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

First, we're told there's no WMDs.

Then, it's those that were found out in the desert were nothing more than snow cone trucks and agricultural fertilizers.

Today, the WMDs recently found are old and not of any significance despite the fact we've spend untold millions of taxpayer dollars and man hours between investigators and military.

Next, they'll tell us Saddam was a good guy... oh, never mind, they've played that card already.


13 posted on 06/22/2006 12:56:45 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante
We all should expect this.

They ignore historic facts. As someone else posted earlier, mustard gas canisters from WWI are still being found and in some instances killing people. These people are added to the casualty list of WWI.

Pueblo Colorado chemical weapons depot as still being cleaned up as the munitions there, some as old as 60 years, are still viable.

14 posted on 06/22/2006 12:56:49 PM PDT by technomage (NEVER underestimate the depths to which liberals will stoop for power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

unbelievable. Backstabbers in our own government.


15 posted on 06/22/2006 12:57:09 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

It makes exactly zero difference at all if they had degraded. We had no way to know beforehand, due to Saddaam's kicking out the inspectors, that every chemical round was not brand spanking new and lethal.

They were there, they are there and we found them. That is all that matters


16 posted on 06/22/2006 12:57:54 PM PDT by Personal Responsibility (Amnesia is a train of thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante
But the intelligence officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity, said the weapons were too degraded to have posed a threat to US forces in March 2003.

Intelligent officials could be democrat lawmakers. Oops, that's a contradiction in terms isn't it?

18 posted on 06/22/2006 12:58:39 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante
The Sarin found was still viable I believe.
The point is.. Saddam lied about destroying WMD's.. Something he wasn't allowed to do without UN supervision.
20 posted on 06/22/2006 12:59:02 PM PDT by divine_moment_of_facts ("Liberals see what they believe... Conservatives believe what they see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

Hmm, maybe they don't want the bad guys to know the stuff is still good and don't want them using it. Or, this is another group of Clinto-Punks stirring up things against the administration. If that's the case I suggest they start with the first of the 500 weapons and one by one open them up an stick their heads in them.


21 posted on 06/22/2006 12:59:11 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (What is it about "illegal" you don't understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

Good! So this means that all those stockpiles the military wants to burn can be gotten rid of next week right????

Guess all those law suits can be dropped as well, eh?

;-)


22 posted on 06/22/2006 12:59:46 PM PDT by Freeport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante
These weapons might be "too old to use", but they are still deadly dangerous. More importantly, they were there!

The argument used so freely by the anti-war types, that Bush went to war for the "wrong reasons", or that "Bush lied", has been pretty largely blown out of the water. Saddam HAD'EM! And Rick Santorum was perfectly right in revealing the existence of this report, and publicizing parts of it (some parts are still classified).

23 posted on 06/22/2006 12:59:47 PM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante
The Sarin found was still viable I believe.
The point is.. Saddam lied about destroying WMD's.. Something he wasn't allowed to do without UN supervision.
25 posted on 06/22/2006 1:00:12 PM PDT by divine_moment_of_facts ("Liberals see what they believe... Conservatives believe what they see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

Thank you for posting this article.

"But the intelligence officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity, "


TRANSLATION: The AP reporter has a sock puppet.


26 posted on 06/22/2006 1:00:57 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I will go down with this ship, and I won't put my hands up in surrender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

I was watching Imus this morning and he had a military guy on who said he found a little-publicized report that traces of sarin were found in the Tigis River by our troops.

I had never heard of this and this guy is certainly no fan of the president so I was surprised when he said this.

Anyone else hear this?

Jane


27 posted on 06/22/2006 1:00:59 PM PDT by MRobert (MRobert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson