Kerry called timetable 'cut and run' in 2003

WND ^ | 23 June 2006

[Stultis]

BUT, while he was against it before he was for it, he was for it before that. Er, I mean he was for it, before he was against it, before he was for it again. (With certain intermediate periods when he was forgainst it.) Wait, is that right? Ah, I mean it's a Flop-Flip-Flop. Or would that be a Flip-Flop-Flip? Oh, never mind, read the article. (Another flashback):

Transfer of Sovereignty: Kerry was for an Iraq "timetable" before he was against an "arbitrary date" ^

Posted by Stultis On News/Activism ^ 04/07/2004 2:14:33 AM CDT · 24 replies · 135+ views Linked thread and linked speeches | 6 April 2003 | Self According the following Reuters report... Kerry Says June 30 Iraq Handover Date a 'Mistake' ...John Kerry told reporters on Monday: "I have always said consistently that it is a mistake to set an arbitrary date and I hope that the date has nothing to do with the election here in the United States." Well, not quite. Before the date was agreed on Kerry was not only pestering Bush to speed up the transfer of sovereignty in Iraq (to please and appease the Axis of Weasels and the U.N.) he even called for a "specific timetable" (albeit to be established by...

[fish hawk]

Kerry has to be the most stupid politician in our history. The only thing is, I can't make up my mind which is the most stupid: That no one would remember what he said before or bother to look it up. Or, that he actually thinks that the American people will believe anything that he says.

[TASMANIANRED]

Loss of the Monopoly of the news has doomed the left.