Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: winston2
In brief - it's because it is a great mind and body experience - and not a significant health risk. There are thousands of years of history to prove this.

TOL said the same for LSD, except for the thousands of years part.

128 posted on 06/24/2006 10:02:19 PM PDT by OmahaFields
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: OmahaFields
In brief - it's because it is a great mind and body experience - and not a significant health risk. There are thousands of years of history to prove this.(winston2)

TOL said the same for LSD, except for the thousands of years part.

I have 34 years of experience with cannabis and zero experience with the LSD (or any other powders, pills or injectables) - but - I ran a search for "TOL" "LSD". I came up with a relatively informative video site that shows film of persons under the influence of the various substances.

You Tube

LSD German

From what I saw, LSD seems to be powerful enough to virtually paralyze the user. I have never seen any cannabis that could do that.

In brief - I would say that LSD has the potential to be much more dangerous than cannabis.

160 posted on 06/25/2006 10:49:04 AM PDT by winston2 (In matters of necessity let there be unity, in matters of doubt liberty, and in all things charity:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson