To: All
If a pharmacy refused to carry condoms would there be the same outrage?
10 posted on
06/23/2006 2:06:50 PM PDT by
weegee
(If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
To: weegee
If you have a few minutes, I'll bother to explain the difference in contraception and abortion. But then you'd have no excuse for the vacuous posts defending aborting the alive unborn don'tchaknow.
19 posted on
06/23/2006 3:05:32 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: weegee; MHGinTN
The outrage is pure politics.
Everyone knows by now - especially any pharmacist shoule know - that the chance that Plan B acts as an abortifacient is very slim to nothing. It works before ovulation and/or it slows the sperm. In fact, any Natural Family Planning teacher will tell you that progesterone increases post ovulation to support the uterine lining so that it doesn't slough and encourage implantation.
However, the pharmacist has the right to stock what he wants.
Instead, the pro-abortion forces insist on forcing everyone to support, assist and provide their "choice."
34 posted on
06/23/2006 10:12:54 PM PDT by
hocndoc
(http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
To: weegee
Awesome tagline, hope you don't mind if I use it in my favorite moonbat batting cage.
95 posted on
06/24/2006 11:12:58 PM PDT by
4woodenboats
(The GOP was created by those opposed to Southern Democrat Plantation Slavery...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson