Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Weekend Talk Show *Preview* for 6/24 and 6/25/06 (not the live thread)
Network and Cable News Networks | 6/23/06 | Network and Cable News

Posted on 06/23/2006 7:42:56 PM PDT by Phsstpok

Weekend Talk Show *Preview* for 6/24 and 6/25/06 (not the live thread)

The main message is the Sunday Shows.  Message 1 will be the Saturday Shows and message 2 will be the show guest links post.  Then I'll post the ping list.

Sunday Shows for 6-25-06

ABC This Week (George Stephanopoulos)

CBS Face The Nation (Bob Schieffer)

CNN Late Edition (Wolf Blitzer)

Fox News Sunday (Chris Wallace)

NBC Meet The Press (Tim Russert)

This is NOT intended to be the live Sunday Morning Talk Show thread. I trust AB will do that as usual. This is strictly a preview of who will be on the main shows. The idea is to give folks a chance to muster their resources for that thread.

I would particularly ask that anyone with specific knowledge or resources about the topics / guests announced for these shows post them here so that the rest of us can go into the shows with a heads up on what to look for.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abcthisweek; annekornblut; arlenspecter; barbaraboxer; carllevin; chuckhagel; cnnlateedition; davidbroder; davidgregory; doylemcmanus; facethenation; fareedzakaria; foxnewssunday; guests; hamidkarzai; henrykissinger; husseinshahristani; jeffflake; johnstossel; johnwarner; josephbiden; larrysummers; loudobbs; madeleinealbright; marlothomas; martharaddatz; meetthepress; mitchmcconnell; peteking; richarddurbin; richardlugar; ronbrownstein; russfeingold; sundaytalkshows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Saturday Shows for 6-24-06

The Beltway Boys (Mort Kondrake, Fred Barnes)

CNBC's Tim Russert Show (Tim Russert)

Fox News Watch (Eric Burns)

Journal Editorial Report (Paul Gigot) - FNC show page


1 posted on 06/23/2006 7:43:04 PM PDT by Phsstpok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Weekend Guests 6-24 and 6-25:

 

 

2 posted on 06/23/2006 7:44:19 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun; Bahbah; Txsleuth; MNJohnnie; eeevil conservative; Alas Babylon!; Seattle Conservative; ...
Ping

The Weekend Preview Thread is up

If you would like on or off my ping list please Freepmail me

The forces of the Old Empire are marshaling their counter attack against team Bush.  They are throwing all caution (and discretion) away.  This could be a real interesting weekend.

The most interesting guests to me will be the debate between Mitch McConnell and Dick Durbin.  I can't understand what possessed ABC to give Mitch the opportunity to trash the turban... unless they have some FBI files loaned to them by Hillary?  Stossel is also always fun, but they'll minimize him in the Voices segment.  Watch Hagel and Karzai on CNN for clues to the counter attack against Bush and company to try to blunt their momentum.  And watch for a deal to be offered on immigration between Pete King and the amnesty crowd in exchange for more funding for NY.  Pete has to get reelected, dontcha know?

And watch the trash Bush hit parade on MTP.  That is the leading edge of the counter attack.  I'm betting that Timmah went to his contacts in the Democrat leadership and made it plain that he wouldn't sit still for losing to Steponallofus without fighting back.  They either had to cough up some big guns or he was going to start courting the pubbies.  It looks like the Dims complied, in exchange for a free hand to push their new message without any contrary voices.

The dominant meme appears to be that Bush has had a good couple of weeks in Iraq, so far, but it's now time to get back to all of the bad things that the media wants to concentrate on.  Oh, and the Democrats may be totally in disarray and not have a brain in their heads, but it's obvious to everyone (in the media) what they need to do in order to win in November... isn't it?

Be advised - I'm posting this on Friday night and then going to bed.  I've had a hard week trying to catch up from the trip to Boston and even managed to pick up a bug from a co-worker.  I have a feeling I'm going to be suffering through a minor bout of something all weekend, so I'm going to get some sleep.  I'll respond to you all in the AM.


3 posted on 06/23/2006 7:45:43 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
Meme: What is wrong with these Democrats? We hand them the election on a silver platter and they just screw it up!

Okay, usually it takes a scroll down through a comment or two for the humor to build up and cause a true laugh out loud. This time you sucker punched me right off the bat.

4 posted on 06/23/2006 8:06:34 PM PDT by Bahbah (Democrat Motto: Why not the worst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

Your analyses of the shows is amusing. Thanks for that and for the great links.


5 posted on 06/23/2006 8:10:59 PM PDT by Barset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
and even managed to pick up a bug from a co-worker.

Oh, sorry friend. Feel better. And take care of yourself.

6 posted on 06/23/2006 8:11:13 PM PDT by Bahbah (Democrat Motto: Why not the worst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

Good night...get well, and thank you for all of your hard work.

Hopefully after a good night's sleep, you will be raring to go this weekend.

I was surfing through some lib websites this week..and I found that Russ Feingold seems to be getting more and more popular, as Hillary and Kerry have disappointed the progressives...sigh.

Oh,...but, I even saw one post that suggested that Babs Boxer would make a great POTUS candidate!!!

BDS..it's everywhere!


7 posted on 06/23/2006 8:20:12 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah; Phsstpok

I turned on Alan Colmes' radio show...

and HIS new "talking point" re: the terrorist group in Florida??

"I thought we went to Iraq to fight them over there...and now we find out they are here...so, I guess Bush lied again..."

Also...of course he is appalled about the feds getting the banking transactions of terrorists.


8 posted on 06/23/2006 8:25:54 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

ROFLOL! You aren't the only one! Phsstpok said he wasn't feeling well and tired, but he was definitely on his game w that one!


9 posted on 06/23/2006 8:36:25 PM PDT by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops and their CIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

Thanks as always Phsstpok. I was traveling last weekend and couldn't catch up until Monday.

Glad I'm back on schedule.

:)


10 posted on 06/23/2006 9:14:27 PM PDT by Chuck54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
Tim Russert's lineup is so abhorrent I feel like I've wandered over to the Daily Kooks website.

Week after week, your analysis is spot on and your professional delivery makes this thread a delight to read.

Hope you feel better soon, Phsstpok.
11 posted on 06/24/2006 5:33:08 AM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

Here is part of a post from yesterday which is a dialogue between Hugh Hewitt and Mark Steyn which was a great read: "Bill Hemmer: Well, what kind of a message are you sending them, if you're suggesting leave before that mission's complete?

BB: Well, we're sending them the message that we stand behind them. We're sending them a message very clearly, we Democrats, that we want to give them what they need to do the job, that we want to be with them when they come home, and that we want to give them a mission that is doable and that is winnable. And you know, 99% of the Republicans said stay the course. And if you go back to a Republican president, Teddy Roosevelt, who said essentially that blind adherence to an executive by the Congress is unpatriotic. I think that's a fascinating thing. We need to stand up for our troops. We have to stand against the status quo which is not working."

I wonder if Senator Boxer will say something equally profound on FTN. Here is the link if anyone would like to read the entire interview, which is quite good:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1654498/posts


12 posted on 06/24/2006 5:53:05 AM PDT by Bahbah (Democrat Motto: Why not the worst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

bttt


13 posted on 06/24/2006 8:39:42 AM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok; Txsleuth; anita; rodguy911; All
(phsstpok- your name is so hard to remember for posting .. LOL .. how do you say it?? ;)

Added to info re Karzai, he recently slammed the media and issued directives. This is to counter their glorifying giving the Taliban and conferring equal footing with those fighting for freedom. Of course, he's is being slammed by the lib organizations for squelching freedom of speech:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Also on Thursday, the Afghan president defended guidelines issued to news groups about reporting on the Taliban insurgency, saying some media were "legitimising terrorism" in their articles.

He said he would guarantee media freedom but his government was concerned about how some of the media were reporting on the insurgency by the Taliban movement.

Media guidelines

Karzai said: "Part of the media especially the electronic media are ... almost legitimising some acts of terrorism. That's what we're concerned about. That's what we are trying to correct."

The document containing the guidelines was sent to Afghan editors on Monday, prompting an outcry from rights groups concerned about press freedom as Afghanistan tries to establish itself as a democracy.

It says "terrorist commanders" should not be interviewed or the Nato and US-led forces criticised.

"These directives are an insult to the hard work and personal sacrifice of Afghan journalists who try to get the truth out to the public"

Sami Zarifi, Human Rights Watch

Stories of terror activities should not lead news bulletins and "enemy" statements which portray the government as un-Islamic should not be covered or the security forces portrayed as weak.

Some television stations have broadcast interviews with alleged Taliban officials who speak against Karzai's government and the thousands of international soldiers based in Afghanistan to hunt down Taliban and al-Qaeda fighters.

Other media prominently carry Taliban claims about attacks that turn out to be false or exaggerated.

The hand-delivered 24-point list was anonymous but understood to have been issued by the intelligence service which had summoned editors to a meeting on the topic last week.

'An insult'

New York-based Human Rights Watch criticised the notice, saying it should be immediately revoked by the government.

Sam Zarifi, the group's Asia research director, said: "The intelligence services restrictions are a blatant intrusion on the freedom of Afghanistan's fledgling media.

"These directives are an insult to the hard work and personal sacrifice of Afghan journalists who try to get the truth out to the public."

The Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission said it was concerned but added that it had reservations about some of the media's reporting.

14 posted on 06/24/2006 10:51:29 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

That sounds like President Bush and President Karzai need to talk...they have a LOT in common, re: having to fight the press, as well as the terrorists.


15 posted on 06/24/2006 11:27:25 AM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All
Mark Kilmer's Sunday show preview is up at RedState.COM and his own blog, http://www.rightsided.org/:

The Sunday Show Lineup


For Sunday, June 25, 2006

Meet the Press (NBC): Host Tim Russert will talk to -- brace yourselves! -- Russ Feingold. They'll discuss "GET OUT OF IRAQ NOW!," "Russ '08," and maybe cheese.

FOX News Sunday (FNS): Host Chris Wallace will talked timetable/date certain, pro and con, with John Warner and Carl Levin. Then he turns his attention back to immigration, with Arlen Specter and Peter King.

Face the Nation (CBS): Host Bob Schieffer has the WashPost's Doyle McManus in to help him ask questions of Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Dick Lugar and Democrat FR committeeperson Babs Boxer.

This Week (ABC): Host George Stephanopoulos chats with Mitch McConnell and that famed Nazi hunter Dick Durbin. Some affiliates will do the World Cup thing instead of Durbin & Steph. (The GOP Senate whip can take care of himself.) It depends on the House postion, if you're using the Equal House system, on the synastry chart for Durbin and Steph, and if Capricorn is at the cusp of the seventh house. It's a complex formula, but the show will be aired on my affiliate, in the neonatal binary cusp preceeded by Pluto.

Late Edition (CNN): Host Wolf Blitzer has a good one this week. He talks to Afghan President Hamid Karzai then... together for the umpteenth time, Joe Biden andChuck Hagel.
-----

Better Russ than Kerry again. The smartest Dem on this week is Specter (FNS), and he's a Republican. (Karzai is a democrat, but the D isn't capitalized.) Warner is pretty good at handling Levin, and Mitch can handle Durbin. This is a R vs. D saga, several degrees more intense because the Dems want desperately to smell blood for the November general elections.

Print This Story
Comments >> Jun 24th, 2006: 13:03:30

For those who have missed it, the cryptic references to astrology are not so subtle smackdowns of Kos' partner in crime, Jerome Armstrong, who apparently made his mark by using astrology to predict the future (though it may have been mostly after the fact).  It appears he may also have used this "skill" to tout stocks and / or politicians, which Kos then conveniently began pushing on his web site (that last part may not have started till Armstrong was barred from doing stocks by the SEC and went into political consulting).  Inquiring minds (at the DOJ) want to now.


16 posted on 06/24/2006 11:43:41 AM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
(phsstpok- your name is so hard to remember for posting .. LOL .. how do you say it?? ;)

It's pronounced (at least by me... I've never heard it said out loud) "fist pock" with a minor click between the syllables.  It's from Larry Niven's early novel Protector.  From the novel: "A hiss and snap of beak: Phssth-pok."  Niven actually spells it Phssthpok, but that just seemed a bit much for me. <g>

I had not seen the material on Karzai complaining about the media coverage.  All I heard was his complaints that could be used as attacks on us and the British.  Why am I not surprised?

Great catch.  I wonder if Wolfie will steer clear of this topic or tie it in with the controversy over the NY Slimes treasonous behavior?

17 posted on 06/24/2006 11:57:35 AM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

Thanks .. hearing how it sounds makes writing it easier. And thanks for ALL you do, phsst! ;)


18 posted on 06/24/2006 12:43:36 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; Bahbah; Phsstpok; All

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1654871/posts

Here is a thread from early this morning....I thought I would bring it here...since Howie Dean DID do the dem response today...

And, I am sure this subject will be brought up tonight and tomorrow.


19 posted on 06/24/2006 1:40:59 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

I heard on Fox News a little while ago....that the Senate Judiciary Committee (Arlen Specter)...will be having "hearings" on the newest leak by the NYTimes..the tracking of the finances of terrorists...

THAT didn't take long, since the story just broke--Arlen must have broken a land speed record to get THAT hearing together...

Of course, the hearing isn't to find out who is a the bottom of LEAKING, or to find out if it is kosher for the NYTimes, LATimes, and Wall Street Journal...to go ahead and publish a story after being explicitly ASKED not to, by the POTUS/CIC during a time of war.


20 posted on 06/24/2006 2:30:44 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson