1 posted on
06/23/2006 11:04:11 PM PDT by
bnelson44
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: bnelson44
Prosecute if they fail to reveal the piece of government trash that let them in on the existence of the program.
2 posted on
06/23/2006 11:05:47 PM PDT by
308MBR
( Somebody sold the GOP to the socialists, and the GOP wasn't theirs to sell.)
To: bnelson44
Congress should pass a new law that says beating the living $#!) out of a journalist is equivalent to jaywalking and a $25 fine.
3 posted on
06/23/2006 11:07:22 PM PDT by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: bnelson44
Infiltrate their "newsroom", and find out who in the gov is leaking, discredit, prosecute, and shut them down.
To: bnelson44
I would suggest people write their congressmen and insist these people are prosecuted.
5 posted on
06/23/2006 11:10:17 PM PDT by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: bnelson44
Treason, plain and simple. Covers the leaker and the publisher.
6 posted on
06/23/2006 11:11:02 PM PDT by
Kryptonite
(Keep Democrats Out of Power!)
To: bnelson44
Couldn't we only prosecute them if a war had been officially declared? Not sure how that works.
7 posted on
06/23/2006 11:13:30 PM PDT by
pcottraux
(It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
To: bnelson44
CAN JOURNALISTS REALLY BE PROSECUTED for publishing national security secrets? Why wouldn't they?
To: bnelson44
The media thinks the 1st Amendment gives them protection to publish anything they want, including misleading opinions, and to leak classified government info to our enemies. Their prime motive though, is to harm our President and his administration's goals.
9 posted on
06/23/2006 11:19:44 PM PDT by
raisincane
(Dims think we're all oblivious to the obvious)
To: bnelson44
>"CAN JOURNALISTS REALLY BE PROSECUTED for publishing national security secrets?"YES!
11 posted on
06/23/2006 11:23:22 PM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
(I'd rather be carrying a shotgun with Dick, than riding shotgun with a Kennedyl!)
To: bnelson44
15 posted on
06/23/2006 11:40:46 PM PDT by
Brad from Tennessee
(Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
To: bnelson44
Little Pinch would make a wonderful cellmate.
20 posted on
06/23/2006 11:55:01 PM PDT by
MistrX
To: bnelson44
22 posted on
06/24/2006 12:42:27 AM PDT by
Christian4Bush
(The Rat Party's goal is to END the conflict, not WIN the conflict...should be the other way around.)
To: bnelson44
I want them locked up, driven into bankruptcy, including the loss of all personal assets and much, much worse.
We can't win the WoT until we deal with these traitors!!
27 posted on
06/24/2006 1:36:42 AM PDT by
Gator113
To: bnelson44
29 posted on
06/24/2006 3:50:47 AM PDT by
SkyPilot
To: bnelson44
30 posted on
06/24/2006 3:57:29 AM PDT by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
To: bnelson44
Question for the NYT's advertisers: Do you really want to aid and abet treason?
32 posted on
06/24/2006 4:17:12 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: bnelson44
the libs and the lamestream press are doing everything in their power to defeat the US. Very soon now I expect them to jump the shark and expose their purpose for everyone to see.
Its inevitable.
40 posted on
06/24/2006 4:36:55 AM PDT by
Pietro
To: bnelson44
Everyone ignores one obvious reason why these newspapers release this information.
It is the 800 pound gorilla in the room. No one wants to talk about it.
1. They release the information because they are on the side of the terrorists and are doing their espionage work for them. Liberals have found that if they condemn classified information as "abuse of power," then they can call themselves "whistleblowers" instead of spies. Then they get lauded for their courage.
41 posted on
06/24/2006 4:39:01 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
To: bnelson44
I say go after them. This BS has got to stop. The press won't stop revealing our secrets until they are taken to account. They need to see one of their smarmy own, in chains, squealing on their way to prison. ;0)
44 posted on
06/24/2006 4:46:20 AM PDT by
cibco
(Xin Loi Saddam)
To: bnelson44
The next NYT Executive staff's board meeting should be something like below:
48 posted on
06/24/2006 4:58:16 AM PDT by
MaDeuce
(Do it to them, before they do it to you! (MaDuce = M2HB .50 BMG))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson