Skip to comments.
Retirees Will Face Dire Straits [Baby Boomers to force following generations to suffer]
Newhouse News ^
| 6/23/3006
| Teresa Dixon Murray
Posted on 06/24/2006 11:14:12 AM PDT by Incorrigible
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 441-452 next last
To: Graymatter
>>More Boomer bashing.
Jealous of our music.And jealous of the days of "free love"!
When I was in college, AIDS had just been announced and everyone, hetero or not, was paraniod!
61
posted on
06/24/2006 11:58:43 AM PDT
by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: Wolfie
Money For Nothing, Rx For Free LOL! Importing illegal immigrants to pay SS taxes seems to be the governments answer.
To: Incorrigible
That's my fear, too. I've invested quite a bit so far. Well, quite a bit for me. If push comes to shove, I sell it all in 2015 or whenever, move it to Swiss bank accounts and bail on this country.
Rest of my stuff is in 401k, can't be touched for 27 years.
63
posted on
06/24/2006 11:59:00 AM PDT
by
xrp
(Fox News Channel: MISSING WHITE GIRL NETWORK)
To: DuncanWaring
See Post 12. Yep! I appreciated that one!
64
posted on
06/24/2006 11:59:57 AM PDT
by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: MineralMan
I hope my parents live to be 100Especially not with you leaving them in that earthquake zone, you parent hating SICKO!
65
posted on
06/24/2006 12:00:19 PM PDT
by
xrp
(Fox News Channel: MISSING WHITE GIRL NETWORK)
To: Incorrigible
>>And jealous of the days of "free love"!
I can't wait to tell my kids about that. But the oldest is only 28. Way too tender yet.
To: Incorrigible
"But as the article points out, Generation X is saving more than the Baby Boomers at the same age. "
I'm not sure that's even true. Some Gen-Xers are saving and prepping for their retirement. A heckuva lot of them are doing no such thing.
Along the same line, a heckuva lot of boomers have their retirements well in hand. A bunch more don't. And so it is with every generation.
67
posted on
06/24/2006 12:01:52 PM PDT
by
MineralMan
(non-evangelical atheist)
To: wtc911
So you are whining today about somebody who may or may not be whining in twenty years....pretty much validates my original post.LOL!!! OK! Waa! Waa! Waa!
:-)
68
posted on
06/24/2006 12:01:54 PM PDT
by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: Incorrigible
Every time I'm posting stuff where there are liberal young people reading it, I make it a point to mention that a big part of my retirement plan is my voting to keep them chained to the oars and paying high taxes to support me. I've saved up a tidy sum and I won't really need government support, but they don't know that. I'm hoping that gloating about confiscating their wages to pay for my beach house and Viagra might cause some of them to start thinking that Social Security privatization might be a good idea.
69
posted on
06/24/2006 12:03:16 PM PDT
by
John Jorsett
(scam never sleeps)
To: Incorrigible
I am a tail-end boomer. DON'T blame it on me. There will be nothing left for me either.
But unfortunately for the present boomer retirees, there is nothing left for anyone to take from me. Some very vicious conservatives beat them to it. And they know who they are.
70
posted on
06/24/2006 12:03:34 PM PDT
by
TAdams8591
(Ann Coulter = The Conserative Diva)
To: MineralMan
Along the same line, a heckuva lot of boomers have their retirements well in hand. A bunch more don't. And so it is with every generation.Well, the article didn't give a break down of Gen X saving rates, but it states that only a forth of Boomers are prepared and a forth will likely be destitute. The other half is iffy.
71
posted on
06/24/2006 12:03:57 PM PDT
by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: John Jorsett
Every time I'm posting stuff where there are liberal young people reading itThe very definition of a GenX thread.
72
posted on
06/24/2006 12:04:38 PM PDT
by
Glenn
(Annoy a BushBot...Think for yourself.)
To: Incorrigible
The sky is falling! The Sky is Falling!!
73
posted on
06/24/2006 12:05:16 PM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
To: Incorrigible
"When I was in college, AIDS had just been announced and everyone, hetero or not, was paraniod!"
Yeah. When I was in college, there was no such thing as AIDS. The birth control pill had just been introduced and most of the other STDs weren't all that prevalent on the college scene (except for gonorrhea).
Times were good. I was in college from 63-65, then spent 4 years in the USAF and came back to college in 1970. No AIDS in any of those years. Good times!
74
posted on
06/24/2006 12:05:58 PM PDT
by
MineralMan
(non-evangelical atheist)
To: Incorrigible
my concern is that spendthrift Baby Boomers will empower the government to grab my nest egg in order to pay for those who didn't prepare. Thus making my efforts pointless.If that is your concern. Start saving outside retirment accounts. The government will go after those first.
75
posted on
06/24/2006 12:06:43 PM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(The Latest on the Ohio gov race http://blackwellvstrickland.blogspot.com)
To: Incorrigible
I just find it ironic that conservative FReeper GenXers who claim to support traditional family values don't seem to understand that boomers are not the "me" generation, but they certainly seemed to give birth to them. Boomer dads (and some moms) worked their butts off for their GenXer children. Slamming baby boomers when discussing Social Security reform is not something that should go hand-in-hand.
76
posted on
06/24/2006 12:07:37 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: Tax-chick
If any or all of the dire predictions turn out correct, then it will simply prove that it was unreasonable for people to expect up to 40 years of post-work idleness at *somebody's* expense. Darn good point.
77
posted on
06/24/2006 12:08:23 PM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(The Latest on the Ohio gov race http://blackwellvstrickland.blogspot.com)
To: TAdams8591
"But unfortunately for the present boomer retirees"
There are no boomer retirees, yet, except for those who could retire around age 60. I was born in 1945, so I'm 60 years old (for another month). I'm not retiring for several years yet.
The boomers don't start to retire for five more years.
78
posted on
06/24/2006 12:08:42 PM PDT
by
MineralMan
(non-evangelical atheist)
To: dakine
"THAT is not "Third World"...it is what should/used to be normal..."
Precisely! Thank you.
79
posted on
06/24/2006 12:09:08 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: Alberta's Child
I have enough faith in the abject nihilism of this country to assure myself that Baby Boomers will be euthanized once they become a serious burden. Can we call it Roe v. Wade Part II?
80
posted on
06/24/2006 12:09:33 PM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(The Latest on the Ohio gov race http://blackwellvstrickland.blogspot.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 441-452 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson