Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 25 June 2006
Various big media television networks ^ | 25 June 2006 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 06/25/2006 4:45:02 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 761-773 next last
To: OldFriend

Eleven politicians. Two conservatives (McConnell and King).
Good balance,huh?


61 posted on 06/25/2006 5:30:39 AM PDT by ncphinsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: anita

Thanks for the link :)


62 posted on 06/25/2006 5:32:02 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Chuck54

Every Republican in Washington knows that the path to stardom on the Sunday shows is to bash his or her own party.


63 posted on 06/25/2006 5:32:10 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Chuck54

It proves how far left the Democrats are today when they complain about the MSM being too conservative. Then, they use the Clinton scandals as the yardstick as they complain about how we can't let it go. LOL



64 posted on 06/25/2006 5:32:22 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver; All
Good politicians never deal with questions they don't already have the answers to. It's the same with the Sunday drivebys.

These guys they put on over and over basically offer up nothing new. The fat tim's, stuffys, already know what will be said and how that message will defend or help the left since that's what it is all about!

The correction, if there is any, is left to us.We are the keepers of truth.

65 posted on 06/25/2006 5:32:39 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Support new Media, ticket drive-bys--America--Land of the Free because of the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
I suspect her heinous put the word out that if gore gets on the shows, they'll never get her as a guest.

Of course, IMO, I would rather watch gore than hilary any day.

She irks my very last nerve.

66 posted on 06/25/2006 5:32:45 AM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Good morning, AB! Thanks again for your help.


67 posted on 06/25/2006 5:33:21 AM PDT by meema (I am a Conservative Traditional Republican, NOT an elitist, sexist, cynic or right wing extremist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Watch Boxer de-pants Lugar while he snores away! The MSM/DNC can sure set up those pins!


68 posted on 06/25/2006 5:33:38 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
Great Post Rod. See this Powerline's NYT stock slide graph showing their decline since Bush came.
69 posted on 06/25/2006 5:33:56 AM PDT by anita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911; All

In case you haven't seen this yet- a thoughtful commentary by a new FReeper:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1655049/posts


70 posted on 06/25/2006 5:35:27 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

Will even one Sunday morning host remind the Democrats that after Clinton signed the Iraqi Liberation Act in 1998, they were ALL concerned about Iraq's WMD program? Kerry even appeared on ABC with Cokie Roberts and urged regime change with Americans boots on the ground.

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." -- From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among others on October 9, 1998

"This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer- range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." -- From a December 6, 2001 letter signed by Bob Graham, Joe Lieberman, Harold Ford, & Tom Lantos among others

"Whereas Iraq has consistently breached its cease-fire agreement between Iraq and the United States, entered into on March 3, 1991, by failing to dismantle its weapons of mass destruction program, and refusing to permit monitoring and verification by United Nations inspections; Whereas Iraq has developed weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and biological capabilities, and has made positive progress toward developing nuclear weapons capabilities" -- From a joint resolution submitted by Tom Harkin and Arlen Specter on July 18, 2002

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed." -- Madeline Albright, 1998

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he has 10 times since 1983" -- National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Feb 18, 1998

"Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement." -- Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not yet achieved nuclear capability." -- Robert Byrd, October 2002

"There's no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat... Yes, he has chemical and biological weapons. He's had those for a long time. But the United States right now is on a very much different defensive posture than we were before September 11th of 2001... He is, as far as we know, actively pursuing nuclear capabilities, though he doesn't have nuclear warheads yet. If he were to acquire nuclear weapons, I think our friends in the region would face greatly increased risks as would we." -- Wesley Clark on September 26, 2002

"What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad's regime did use such weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has continued armament programs." -- Jacques Chirac, October 16, 2002

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." -- Bill Clinton in 1998

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security." -- Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002

"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

"Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them against his own people." -- Tom Daschle in 1998

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"I share the administration's goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons of mass destruction." -- Dick Gephardt in September of 2002

"Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Bob Graham, December 2002

"Saddam Hussein is not the only deranged dictator who is willing to deprive his people in order to acquire weapons of mass destruction." -- Jim Jeffords, October 8, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Ted Kennedy, September 27, 2002

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed." -- Ted Kennedy, Sept 27, 2002

"I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- John F. Kerry, Oct 2002

"The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the end of that war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after Operation Desert Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has continued to build those weapons. He has had a free hand for 4 years to reconstitute these weapons, allowing the world, during the interval, to lose the focus we had on weapons of mass destruction and the issue of proliferation." -- John Kerry, October 9, 2002

"(W)e need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. ...And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War." -- John Kerry, Jan 23, 2003

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandates of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." -- Carl Levin, Sept 19, 2002

"Every day Saddam remains in power with chemical weapons, biological weapons, and the development of nuclear weapons is a day of danger for the United States." -- Joe Lieberman, August, 2002

"Over the years, Iraq has worked to develop nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. During 1991 - 1994, despite Iraq's denials, U.N. inspectors discovered and dismantled a large network of nuclear facilities that Iraq was using to develop nuclear weapons. Various reports indicate that Iraq is still actively pursuing nuclear weapons capability. There is no reason to think otherwise. Beyond nuclear weapons, Iraq has actively pursued biological and chemical weapons.U.N. inspectors have said that Iraq's claims about biological weapons is neither credible nor verifiable. In 1986, Iraq used chemical weapons against Iran, and later, against its own Kurdish population. While weapons inspections have been successful in the past, there have been no inspections since the end of 1998. There can be no doubt that Iraq has continued to pursue its goal of obtaining weapons of mass destruction." -- Patty Murray, October 9, 2002

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -- Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998

"Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production." -- Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998


71 posted on 06/25/2006 5:35:40 AM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Wow...what a lineup. Durbin has replaced Daschle as the pol who appears virtually every Sunday with a saddened, simpering commentary. Feingold is the epitome of the "oily politician" cliche. He alone could solve the energy crisis with his own output. Biden's ignorance of foreign policy is only surpassed by his gift for condescending. Specter and Hagel. If I want to see RINOs, I'll watch The Discovery Channel. It's probably safer to tune out this week. I just enjoyed a great breakfast. I'd prefer to keep it down.

Carl Levin and the family dog. I guess owners and pets do resemble each other.

72 posted on 06/25/2006 5:35:53 AM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver

Their standard is impeach Bush now. If the MSM isn't demanding it every day then the moonbats consider them to not be doing their job.


73 posted on 06/25/2006 5:36:12 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Regarding Al Gore's movie about global warming:

17,000 scientists to date have signed a petition disputing Gore's contention that global warming is human induced.

The scientists further state that the earth goes through cycles and this is but one cycle that we've seen before.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1654996/posts


74 posted on 06/25/2006 5:37:22 AM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
I would rather watch gore than hillary any day

If you lust for comic relief, I agree whole heartedly with you OldFriend. there is no one stupider or funnier to watch than algorrr.

However, since cankles will probably be "the one" for their side it can be very helpful to put her on the record in regards to anything. So far she has triangulated every issue there is. We need rock hard statements out of her on something, the war, immigration, drilling anything, so her true nature can be revealed.

Reveal the true hillary and she loses every time.

75 posted on 06/25/2006 5:38:48 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Support new Media, ticket drive-bys--America--Land of the Free because of the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

A good day not to watch TV. I wonder what Al-Jeezera or the North Koreans are showing this morning. Probably pretty much the same as the lineup here.


76 posted on 06/25/2006 5:39:03 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Sorry AB, I think the REAL winners for last week is Morgan, samantha & Seattle Conservative.


77 posted on 06/25/2006 5:40:09 AM PDT by anita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: anita
Thanks anita. I must be having computer problems can't bring it up.I will try it at work leaving real quick now.
78 posted on 06/25/2006 5:40:26 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Support new Media, ticket drive-bys--America--Land of the Free because of the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
IIRC .. Feingold was co-sponsor to Kerry's Amendment.

Yes, I knew this. You'd think though, since Kerry is the bigger name, and Russert needs the ratings (he's second place to Stephanopolus), he'd seek out Kerry. But I guess agenda trumps ratings. Kerry makes a fool of himself. Frankly, I think the dems and the DBM dem-lovers like Russert just want Kerry to go away. So they're grooming the NEXT dem challenger, Feingold! Crazy, but that's the explaination, along with Kerry sulking.

79 posted on 06/25/2006 5:40:27 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Good politicians are grounded in firm beliefs, character and a solid political philosophy that works for them no matter what the question is, or who's asking it. I agree with you, they need to have thought through their positions and possible answers, but Republicans are usually better prepared since they don't have to lie about where they stand on an issue. Democrats, OTOH, have to keep dodging and weaving because they are fearful voters will learn their true beliefs.


80 posted on 06/25/2006 5:40:28 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 761-773 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson