Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
"However, the 1st amendment seems pretty air tight to me"

When did the first amendment start covering leaking classified national security secrets to Al Quaeda so they can kill more Americans?


"Like I said, they can still print whatever they wish."

And Saddam Hussein is mother Theresa too.
No one is above the law.
53 posted on 06/27/2006 5:15:37 AM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Jameison; P-Marlowe

Simply read the amendment and look at past interpretations of it.

In the Pentagon Papers case, the Supreme Court's decision included this: "Both the history and language of the First Amendment support the view that the press must be left free to publish news whatever the source, without censorship, injunctions, or prior restraint." http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB48/decision.pdf

There is no claim, however, that LEAKERS are not subject to prosecution.

If I want the other amendments (religion, guns, etc) interpreted strictly, then I must do the same with the press.)


54 posted on 06/27/2006 6:34:39 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson