I think this is a pic of Dr. Corsi--in the back middle with the yellow shirt.
Posted on 06/26/2006 3:12:28 PM PDT by rockabyebaby
LOL This week leads up to the most patriotic holiday, and conservative radio goes on holiday to celebrate. :)
Yes, I had a niggling in my mind that Corsi was that Freeper, and I remember that time.
That was one talented dog! RIP Eddie! (I think his real name was Moose.)
You are funny with your pictures. I like the touch. It livens the thread up. I try to post pictures as well when it crosses my mind.
I think this is a pic of Dr. Corsi--in the back middle with the yellow shirt.
Hey, you didn't post a pic of Eddie. They say it comes in threes. Does that mean two more famous pooches will pass on soon?:(
The dog that drove Frasier crazy has died.
Eddie was played on the TV series by a Jack Russell terrier named Moose. His trainer tells People magazine that Moose was 16 and a half years old when he died at her home in Los Angeles.
He'd been retired for the last six and a half years of his life.
Moose also starred in the movie "My Dog Skip" as the older Skip.
He had a cute face.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1639323/posts
Article by Dr. Jerome Corsi:
The Reason for Amnesty: Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America
The Plan to Replace the Dollar With the 'Amero'
by Jerome R. Corsi Posted May 22, 2006
The idea to form the North American Union as a super-NAFTA knitting together Canada, the United States and Mexico into a super-regional political and economic entity was a key agreement resulting from the March 2005 meeting held at Baylor University in Waco, Tex., between President Bush, President Fox and Prime Minister Martin.
A joint statement published by the three presidents following their Baylor University summit announced the formation of an initial entity called, “The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” (SPP). The joint statement termed the SPP a “trilateral partnership” that was aimed at producing a North American security plan as well as providing free market movement of people, capital, and trade across the borders between the three NAFTA partners:
We will establish a common approach to security to protect North America from external threats, prevent and respond to threats within North America, and further streamline the secure and efficient movement of legitimate, low-risk traffic across our borders.
A working agenda was established:
We will establish working parties led by our ministers and secretaries that will consult with stakeholders in our respective countries. These working parties will respond to the priorities of our people and our businesses, and will set specific, measurable, and achievable goals.
The U.S. Department of Commerce has produced a SPP website, which documents how the U.S. has implemented the SPP directive into an extensive working agenda.
Following the March 2005 meeting in Waco, Tex., the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) published in May 2005 a task force report titled “Building a North American Community.” We have already documented that this CFR task force report calls for a plan to create by 2010 a redefinition of boundaries such that the primary immigration control will be around the three countries of the North American Union, not between the three countries. We have argued that a likely reason President Bush has not secured our border with Mexico is that the administration is pushing for the establishment of the North American Union.
The North American Union is envisioned to create a super-regional political authority that could override the sovereignty of the United States on immigration policy and trade issues. In his June 2005 testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Robert Pastor, the Director of the Center for North American Studies at American University, stated clearly the view that the North American Union would need a super-regional governance board to make sure the United States does not dominate the proposed North American Union once it is formed:
NAFTA has failed to create a partnership because North American governments have not changed the way they deal with one another. Dual bilateralism, driven by U.S. power, continue to govern and irritate. Adding a third party to bilateral disputes vastly increases the chance that rules, not power, will resolve problems.
This trilateral approach should be institutionalized in a new North American Advisory Council. Unlike the sprawling and intrusive European Commission, the Commission or Council should be lean, independent, and advisory, composed of 15 distinguished individuals, 5 from each nation. Its principal purpose should be to prepare a North American agenda for leaders to consider at biannual summits and to monitor the implementation of the resulting agreements.
Pastor was a vice chairman of the CFR task force that produced the report “Building a North American Union.”
Pastor also proposed the creation of a Permanent Tribunal on Trade and Investment with the view that “a permanent court would permit the accumulation of precedent and lay the groundwork for North American business law.” The intent is for this North American Union Tribunal would have supremacy over the U.S. Supreme Court on issues affecting the North American Union, to prevent U.S. power from “irritating” and retarding the progress of uniting Canada, Mexico, and the U.S. into a new 21st century super-regional governing body.
Robert Pastor also advises the creation of a North American Parliamentary Group to make sure the U.S. Congress does not impede progress in the envisioned North American Union. He has also called for the creation of a North American Customs and Immigration Service which would have authority over U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) within the Department of Homeland Security.
Pastor’s 2001 book “Toward a North American Community” called for the creation of a North American Union that would perfect the defects Pastor believes limit the progress of the European Union. Much of Pastor’s thinking appears aimed at limiting the power and sovereignty of the United States as we enter this new super-regional entity. Pastor has also called for the creation of a new currency which he has coined the “Amero,” a currency that is proposed to replace the U.S. dollar, the Canadian dollar, and the Mexican peso.
If President Bush had run openly in 2004 on the proposition that a prime objective of his second term was to form the North American Union and to supplant the dollar with the “Amero,” we doubt very much that President Bush would have carried Ohio, let alone half of the Red State majority he needed to win re-election. Pursuing any plan that would legalize the conservatively estimated 12 million illegal aliens now in the United States could well spell election disaster for the Republican Party in 2006, especially for the House of Representative where every seat is up for grabs.
I WANT MY COUNTRY BACK!!!
That was a rant worthy of the Savage Nation
Rush will be back on tomorrow. Savage is on vacation all week. Locally, Al Rantel is on vacation until July 8. O'Reilly was on this morning.
Don't know about the rest of 'em.
In the last several years, our betters have taken to the notion that they can just sign off on agreements, and they have the effect of a treaty. Treaties become part of the law of the land, an amending of the Constitution if you will. That is my opinion, it may be wrong, but it is my understanding.
That seems to correspond with what I read from other FReepers on threads relating to this.
I didn't have a chance to get back on line last evening to discuss the rush situation, by now we all know he got caught will a prescription of viagra that was not issued in his name,,something to ponder for this evening's thread, wonder if Rick Roberts will mention it..........later!
Sounds like pure (demonrat) harassment to me.
That was one heck of a blooletting on post 15. !LOL!
That was like the Savage of old; the likes of which we don't hear all that often anymore. I like it!
I don't know how Rush can be so careless about that Viagra thing. You can call it a lib conspiracy all you want ( and it is to some degree): but Rush and Viagra?
Who's the (un)lucky girl?
No no no, they are all at their illuminati meeting this week.
ok, well what do we do about it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.