Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: steveyp
It seems to me that the NYT violated 18USC Section 798.
Sec. 798. Disclosure of classified information

(a) Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information--
...
(2) concerning the design, construction, use, maintenance, or repair of any device, apparatus, or appliance used or prepared or planned for use by the United States or any foreign government for cryptographic or communication intelligence purposes; or
(3) concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government; or
(4) obtained by the processes of communication intelligence from the communications of any foreign government, knowing the same to have been obtained by such processes--

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

...
(b) As used in subsection (a) of this section-- The term ``classified information'' means information which, at the time of a violation of this section, is, for reasons of national security, specifically designated by a United States Government Agency for limited or restricted dissemination or distribution;
...
The term ``foreign government'' includes in its meaning any person or persons acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of any faction, party, department, agency, bureau, or military force of or within a foreign country, or for or on behalf of any government or any person or persons purporting to act as a government within a foreign country, whether or not such government is recognized by the United States;
The term ``communication intelligence'' means all procedures and methods used in the interception of communications and the obtaining of information from such communications by other than the intended recipients;


61 posted on 06/26/2006 11:55:54 PM PDT by burzum (Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.--Adm. Rickover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: prophetic

Yes, this editorial need to get to the media while the recent New York Times leak is still a top story. It deserves to have maximum impact.

To be done in the spirit of "human interest."


62 posted on 06/27/2006 2:55:03 AM PDT by drierice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: burzum; steveyp
MAJOR B-U-M-P!

Excellent find, steveyp. Investigative journalism at its finest.

71 posted on 06/27/2006 4:01:49 AM PDT by shezza (God bless our military heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson