Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Governor’s race big news here but not elsewhere [Oregon]
AP/gazettetimes ^ | June 26, 2006 | JULIA SILVERMAN

Posted on 06/26/2006 9:44:31 PM PDT by ncountylee

PORTLAND — The Oregon governor’s race has all the earmarks of a good political yarn: an up-by-his-bootstraps incumbent who has been fending off a run of bad luck, a well-funded challenger with his own tightropes to walk, and a supporting cast of potential spoilers who practically guarantee a November fight to the finish.

So why has the race yet to generate much heat beyond state lines?

True, governor’s races, especially those in smaller states, don’t tend to draw the same scrutiny — and dollars — as close competitions for the U.S. Senate. True too, Oregon lacks the starpower claimed by California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger or the giant reach of Texas Gov. Rick Perry, both Republican incumbents facing high-profile re-election campaigns this fall.

But Oregon Gov. Ted Kulongoski is consistently ranked as one of the top two or three incumbent Democrats in trouble this fall, with a post-primary survey giving him a negligible two-point lead over Republican Ron Saxton, well within the margin of error.

There are only two other Democratic incumbents whom polls suggest are in as serious danger of losing their jobs: Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm and Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle. Both Midwestern campaigns have compelling storylines: Granholm, once considered a rising star in the Democratic Party, has been plagued by Michigan’s stubbornly bad economy, while Doyle has been dragged down because of a corruption scandal among members of his administration.

National groups have focused on both those races, hoping that winning control of the governor’s seat will help them carry Michigan and Wisconsin in the 2008 presidential election.

(Excerpt) Read more at gazettetimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: election2006; electiongovernor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: ncountylee

Ted Kulongoski is a lack luster incompetent and generally do-nothing goober with no media skills for starters.

Oregon isn't as liberal as it was 30 years ago. The local economies really never recovered from Carter and have been further damaged by enviro whackos and anti business attitudes and runaway courts found in the I-5 corridor.

The Democratic party at one time boasted nearly 70% of registered voters in Oregon. Now they are even with the Republicans in the low 30's.

Most voters are fed up with both parties, but this cycle, I believe they are more fed up with Dems than Republicans.


21 posted on 06/28/2006 4:42:15 PM PDT by Valpal1 (Big Media is like Barney Fife with a gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
We are Oregon residents since September '05, retired here from California.

There is an admirable quality about Gov. Kulongoski - he is a former Marine. He grew up in an orphanage, a real American success story.

He makes a point of going to every single military funeral, and without fanfare. He does it quietly, with respect for the family, absolutely no photo ops.

I honestly like him personally, even though I'm a Republican. In fact, I've never voted for a Democrat in my life.

Has he actually come out in support of gay "marriage"? I believe he is a Catholic (not that THAT necessarily makes a difference, i.e., cafeteria Catholics Kennedy-Kerry).

22 posted on 06/28/2006 4:47:36 PM PDT by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Inspectorette
There is an admirable quality about Gov. Kulongoski - he is a former Marine.

Just being a Marine doesn't make you admirable, a good Marine or qualified to be governor. The argumentum misericordian (appeal to sympathy) is an informal fallacy of logic and a leftist liberal mindset.

Pete Wilson, former governor of California was a Marine, and a damn good one, but that isn't what made him a good governor...

23 posted on 06/28/2006 5:40:17 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
My sentence structure was faulty - I didn't mean he was admirable for "just being a Marine". I was referring to his "up by the bootstraps" success story, as well as his genuine care and concern for our troops.

Sorry for the misunderstanding.

24 posted on 06/28/2006 5:52:23 PM PDT by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
Just an addendum, Portland is so far left, the Mayor won't allow the local Police to cooperate with the FBI Anti-Terrorism task force.
I can only guess they have a policy; "Better Dimmi than dead"
25 posted on 06/28/2006 6:00:29 PM PDT by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
Statement: "...all the while it turns out he was boffing his 14 year old babysitter..."

Response: Typical, in America, 2006 A.D. (Probably threw in a 12 year old pleasure boy from time to time.]

26 posted on 06/28/2006 6:07:57 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Didn't know that. I just wish that Saxton were pro-life.

I don't trust Saxton. He sounds like Lars Larson, with no details. Our Democratic governor established a homo-promo committee that is scheduled to release its conclusions December 1, right AFTER the election. Saxton should challenge the Governor to move the date forward to reveal his agenda.

27 posted on 06/28/2006 7:37:55 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
I also wish that Saxton were pro-life. I'm in a real quandary with this election. I voted for Atkinson in the primary and I really don't want to vote for anyone who is pro-abortion. But at the same time, I definitely don't want that do-nothing idiot Kulongowski to win. I think Saxton is a RINO.

So, do I vote my conscience and throw my vote away on a third party, pro-life candidate or do I vote for the pro-abortion RINO who may be slightly better than the casino loving lefty?

And is there any way to clean up the city of Portland? The mayor and commissioners are all corrupt socialists and a giant embarrassment.
28 posted on 06/28/2006 9:34:11 PM PDT by Evie Munchkin (Democrats - lovers of death and taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Evie Munchkin

I understand your sense of frustration. It's not an easy choice. I supported Atkinson, but didn't vote for him, having moved across the river a few years ago to improve my take home pay.

There are worse things than a do-nothing Dem, an activist RINO, for instance. Kulongowski hasn't *done* much wrong, or much good either. From a conservative point of view that's not a bad place to be.

I don't remember what Saxton is for, acutually. But I would probably tend to vote for him anyway because shaking up the political machine is a good thing. Kulongowski, as I mentioned above, is certainly at the heart of it.

For the same reasons replacing the corrupt Katz administration with Potter was a plus, even if it didn't fundamentally change the politics of Portland going from far-left, socialist nutcase-led to mid-left soft-socialist semi-rationalism is a good thing.


29 posted on 06/29/2006 9:34:34 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Well when a RINO is running we will always have a shot.

Im not voting, we get a liberal republican. Im done voting for RINOs


30 posted on 06/30/2006 4:41:06 PM PDT by OregonRepublican (Jesus Loves you Allah wants you dead! Liberalism is a mental Disorder- Savage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OregonRepublican
I supported Atkinson in the primary, but I'm also willing to vote for Saxton in the general. He may be pro-choice and somewhat "moderate" on certain other issues, but he at least favors common-sense restrictions like parental consent and a ban on partial-birth abortion. Kulongoski, on the other hand, has pledged to "be the last line of defense for a woman's right to choose."

Furthermore, last month Kulongoski signed an executive directive giving gay couples special rights. He has been actively trying to undermine the 2004 Oregon marriage amendment, as he has no respect for the will of the voters. Saxton, on the other hand, has decried attempts to establish marriage-by-another-name. He may not be the perfect candidate, but this race is going to be too close for me to be able to conscience throwing away my vote for a conservative third-party candidate. Saxton is a decent choice, and I think that we should at least give him the chance to show us what he will do.
31 posted on 07/03/2006 2:18:08 PM PDT by NathanDahlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson