[SampleMan]

No, it would be because I DO adhere to the evidence, and your posting history does not support you claim

Really? All my posts (3000+)are available to you. Which one are you basing this on? Or is it just true because you're unwilling to accept that other possibilities might exist?

What would the world do without objective folk like you to tell them what they must think?

Cry me a river.

Crying? I was sympathizing with your plight. Its not easy keeping an iron grip on a doctrine of infallibility. You try to keep it pure, but before you know it, someone is off thinking on their own and even trying to convince other people. Such things just can't be tolerated. Perhaps a system of scientific excommunication could be used? Wait! Now that I think of it, its already being practiced by the Global Warming folks. There's nothing like using a working model.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Which one are you basing this on?"

The collective thrust of them. The mischaracterizations of evolution, evolutionary biologists, and your hyperbolic defenses of attacks on evolution from ID'ers.

"Crying? I was sympathizing with your plight."

You were whining like a democrat about the alleged persecution that was being done to ID'ers. It was pretty funny, in a pathetic sort of way.

"Its not easy keeping an iron grip on a doctrine of infallibility."

More persecution syndrome crap. No scientist is claiming to be infallible. They do correctly state though that ID is theology and not science and has no business being in a science classroom in a government school. That brings out the hysterics from people like you.

Boo hooo. I don't care.

[Stultis]

Its not easy keeping an iron grip on a doctrine of infallibility. You try to keep it pure, but before you know it, someone is off thinking on their own and even trying to convince other people. Such things just can't be tolerated. Perhaps a system of scientific excommunication could be used?</DRAMA QUEEN MODE>

Please remember to close your tags!