Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/27/2006 8:44:55 PM PDT by bnelson44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: bnelson44

shouldn't they find out where the leak is coming from, first?


2 posted on 06/27/2006 8:46:24 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
Rep. J.D. Hayworth (R-Ariz.), working independently from his leadership, began circulating a letter to House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) during a late series of votes yesterday asking his leaders to revoke the Times’s congressional press credentials.

Go get'em J.D!!!!

3 posted on 06/27/2006 8:46:34 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

I hope they pass it.


9 posted on 06/27/2006 8:54:53 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Gentleman, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room - Dr. Strangelove)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

Is a House Resolution comparable to a UN resolution?

How about resolving to start arresting everyone at the NYT associated with the story? Let them spend some of their money on legal fees and bail.


11 posted on 06/27/2006 9:00:29 PM PDT by o_zarkman44 (ELECT SOME WORKERS AND REMOVE THE JERKERS!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

A resolution with NO TEETH. Why bother? I want the NYT OUT OF BUSINESS!!


13 posted on 06/27/2006 9:01:17 PM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44; Liz

Convict and jail the writers. Then, after they meet their jail mate Bubba, work the way up the chain of 'whistle blowers', so to speak...


14 posted on 06/27/2006 9:01:55 PM PDT by Libloather (They can't privatize Social Security but they can find a way to give it to illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

The letter:

http://www.nationalreview.com/pdf/NYT-Hastert%20letter.pdf


17 posted on 06/27/2006 9:05:19 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

Will never happen.

Haven't you just read the lastest entry in the long list of diappointed votes by our " Elected REPRESENTATIVES " ??

The " Flag Desecration Bill " missed being voted into law due to --once again--the officials we ELECTED Based on their STANDS and their Party's ALLEGIANCE to OUR WISHES of Faithfully following the standards of the U.S. Constitution!

First the lack of support for our PRESIDENT!

The the Lack of FULL-"VOICED" support for our Troops & War!

The Lack of Support for Immigration Laws!

and the Lack of VOICE in opposing the Radicals in the media and demorat party!

Nope--we got stuck with just another bunch of aggrandizing, politcally correct welchers that has much as hurt us as would the oppposition party would have if they HAD been elected.


18 posted on 06/27/2006 9:05:27 PM PDT by AirBorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
This type of resolution has its' purposes. In this case, it forces the people's representatives to take a side in public regarding the behavior of the MSM.

This kind of resolution is instructive for the people, just as the "cut and run" votes have been instructive. This will help our cause, and make the MSM scum squirm.

There will be no prosecution of the NYT or LAT, that's not politically feasible. We do need to catch and prosecute the originating leakers, they are doing tremendous damage to the country.
20 posted on 06/27/2006 9:12:02 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Free Iran! WARNING! Forbidden Cartoon: .. . *-O)) :-{>. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

Ohh, how nice, how about some f***ing punishment????????


22 posted on 06/27/2006 9:14:49 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
I heard Judge Napolitano yesterday supporting the NYT because of their 1st Amendment rights. I wanted to call in and ask him this:

Would your position be the same if a paper had printed the following headline stories during WWII

United States breaks German Secret Code

Allied Forces to Land at Normandy in Early June 44

U.S. Forces to drop Atomic Bomb on Japanese Mainland

In my mind the NYT story is no different than if they had ran the above headlines. However, sixty years ago the press would not dare have printed such stories, and if they had they WOULD HAVE been criminally charged with treason

26 posted on 06/27/2006 9:23:54 PM PDT by alvindsv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Txsleuth

Thought you might be interested in this per our recent "conversation" ping.....


30 posted on 06/27/2006 9:37:39 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN..Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4Irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
"The resolution is expected to condemn the leak and publication of classified documents, said one Republican aide with knowledge of the impending legislation."

A public spanking for treason, not a bad deal for the Slimes. Sounds like the Repubs are weenies, afraid to take on the NY Slimes with the Justice Dept.

31 posted on 06/27/2006 9:43:33 PM PDT by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

Good idea. Make a record and let's see which demonrats condemn the NYCrimes.


39 posted on 06/27/2006 9:56:14 PM PDT by Kryptonite (Keep Democrats Out of Power!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

Weird that theHill.com would get the title wrong - its a resolution, not a bill.


41 posted on 06/27/2006 10:01:56 PM PDT by gondramB (Unity of freedom has never relied upon uniformity of opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
Well. . .good to get into the 'record' and a 'beginning'; I guess. . .but NYT's will not care. They are on a mission; and in truth; they are 'media terrorists'; self-aggrandizing and propelled by hate. . .

At least by now; the NYT"s reporters who cover the White House; should have had their credentials pulled - for duration of 'investigation'(. ..assuming of course; there IS one. . .)

And by now. . .the Feds should have already locked and barred their doors after the first printing of the 'Classified' disclosures; and they should stay locked; until the investigation is complete;

. . .and all the guilty participants in this Treason, have met full Justice.

What America pays in 'lives' alone; what sacrifices are made everyday, by our soldiers; and their families. . .

. . .should make this. . .not too much to ask - or expect . Right?

42 posted on 06/27/2006 10:03:30 PM PDT by cricket (Live Liberal free; or suffer their consequences. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
The NY Times USED to be a newspaper.

It is now a daily intelligence report to Bin Laden and Al-Queda.

Time to send in a squad of Special Forces to arrest Sulzberg and Keller, and send them down to Gitmo with the other terrorists.

47 posted on 06/27/2006 10:36:41 PM PDT by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
Why not just enforce the laws on the books?

Such as US Code Title 18, Part I, Chapter 3, § 793:

Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information:

(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any… information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it…

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

Though prison really is too good for them.

51 posted on 06/27/2006 10:54:59 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

They should be calling for the prosecution of the Times (LA and NY). Big f'in deal, more do-nothing feel-good-ism.

Next resolution up, they condemn rainy days and Mondays.


53 posted on 06/27/2006 11:26:13 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile ('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Billy Jeff, Pence, McQueeg & Bush related?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

The only sound the New York Slimes pays attention to is that of crisp green bills crinkling together. We need to hit them in their pocketbook. We need a mass boycott and letter-writing campaign to their biggest advertiser, whomever that might be. I did some googling and couldn't find an answer to that, but did find out that Proctor & Gamble is apparently the country's biggest advertiser in general. Who's up for a boycott with me???


55 posted on 06/28/2006 1:03:39 AM PDT by Hetty_Fauxvert (Kelo must GO!! ..... http://sonoma-moderate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson