[Locomotive Breath]

Another bad analogy, since she would never be allowed to take the stage without knowing what topics she would cover.

You continue to make my points for me. Harvey/Jessen represented this as a celebration of a CP survivor.

I wrote a quick note to the speaker of the House explaining that Gianna is an advocate for cerebral palsy.

It was checked out in advance. But Harvey/Jessen lied about their intentions and, having gotten the microphone, did something different and completely unrelated. Jessen was promised as "A" which was accurate and "A" was acceptable but Jessen was "A" and "B" when it was known by Harvey that "B" would be unacceptable.

The enduring message delivered to the Speaker of the House and anyone listening was that "Harvey the Christian" cannot be trusted. But the Speaker's a baby-killing infidel and it's OK to lie to them? You only have to be truthful to other Christians? Is that your point of view?

[beezdotcom]

You continue to make my points for me. Harvey/Jessen represented this as a celebration of a CP survivor.

Did they not celebrate that? Did SHE as a speaker cover anything else?

You insist that Harvey lied. He did not. You don't like the fact he didn't disclose everything. Fine - that's your right. There's an awful lot about yourself you haven't disclosed here. Maybe there's something about you which, if I knew it, would completely discredit you in my eyes.

Are you a Christian? Do you attend church regularly? What denomination? SHOULD any of these answers matter to how I perceive your logic? MIGHT they?