Further, whatever most pro-choice people believe, it seems that the law allows, and requires states to allow, and permits parents and fathers from being excluded from a position to influence abortion at any stage up to and including a few minutes after the birth of a viable infant.
And my impression, possibly mistaken, is that most pro-choicers don't want the law changed.
As to causes of CP, I concede that CP is not caused by one and only one thing and that we don't know all the causes.
Do you know, however, that anyone knows that the introduction of the saline solution did NOT cause this woman's CP? Do you know that know one knows that it did?
The whole mess is complicated, in this particular instance, though I think the morality is clear.
Just out of curiosity, do you think that the message Ted Harvey sought to spread - with the help and permission of an abortion survivor - wasn't worth what he went through to get it done? Especially considering that he would've (most likely) been turned down had he said the person speaking would be talking about abortion?
After all, the practice of abortion has ended the lives of over 700,000,000 globally since 1920. And that's just recorded. Estimates come around to 900,000,000-1,000,000,000 range. That's a lot of dead babies.
Let me just ask you something; do you think the message wasn't worth it? A message that basically = "Abortion is bad and the unborn are human"?
Please think about your answer. I think God would be a bit more angry at the practice of abortion, and not at Ted Harvey for jumping through the loopholes that exist for abortion (I'm pretty sure they wouldn't have existed if the speaker was going to speak about 'gay rights').