Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/29/2006 10:22:20 AM PDT by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Redcloak

WYOMING Supreme Court, right? not SCOTUS?


2 posted on 06/29/2006 10:23:06 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak

This should be interesting.


3 posted on 06/29/2006 10:23:16 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
This thread has just added to the FreeRepublic "bang list" (firearms interest list) by adding the keyword "banglist".

Any time a firearms-related thread is created on FreeRepublic, please be sure to add the "banglist" keyword to it so that interested FReepers don't miss it.

Let Freedom Ring,

Gun Facts v4.0!

Click the pic to go to the Gun Facts v4.0 download page!

4 posted on 06/29/2006 10:24:01 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak

+


5 posted on 06/29/2006 10:25:27 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak

Well, through out history there have been a lot of people shot with them.


6 posted on 06/29/2006 10:26:42 AM PDT by U S Army EOD (I SHOT DOWN TWA 800 AND FR IS CLOSING IN ON ME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak

Some quibble about legal definition? Seems like if it is a weapon and works by fire it is a firearm.


7 posted on 06/29/2006 10:27:01 AM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak

This opens the door for background checks to purchase muzzleloaders.


8 posted on 06/29/2006 10:31:10 AM PDT by flying Elvis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak

Y'know, I'm just as Pro 2A as anyone, but I've always wondered about this.


10 posted on 06/29/2006 10:35:40 AM PDT by VoiceOfBruck (Are we not men we are De Vos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak

It would avoid a lot of hassle if they'd simply amend the law concerning felons and not the laws about firearms. I think many states simply prohibit felons from possessing deadly weapons. Period. That would do it. Next case.


13 posted on 06/29/2006 10:37:10 AM PDT by Migraine (...diversity is great (until it happens to you)...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
You want an "assualt rifle"?

This weapon has killed more people in the United States than any other single weapon:


17 posted on 06/29/2006 10:48:18 AM PDT by Fido969 (The law is an ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
"Shall not be...."

Oh... never mind. Suffice it to say that the GCA of '68 and a lot of other unConstitutional legislation leaves open "legal" doors that should never have been unlocked.

If someone is that dang dangerous to "society", then just friggin' keep 'em locked up or EXECUTE them. Once the debt is paid, let 'em get on with life.

24 posted on 06/29/2006 11:06:12 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (It is not the oath that makes us believe the man, but the man the oath.- Aeschylus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak

is there a distinction between muzzle and breech loading black powder rifles? for example, the 45-70 gets best performance from black powder.


28 posted on 06/29/2006 11:37:44 AM PDT by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak

If they have served thier time, these rights should be restored. If they haven't served thier time, why are they out?


32 posted on 06/29/2006 11:48:07 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak

No free man shall be debarred the use of arms.


49 posted on 06/29/2006 2:03:54 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bang_list

Ping


51 posted on 06/29/2006 2:08:58 PM PDT by Vision ("America's best days lie ahead. You ain't seen nothing yet"- Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak

I wonder if you will no longer be able to mail order blackpower weapons without going through and FFL?


52 posted on 06/29/2006 2:11:13 PM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
Felons can get illegal guns anytime they want!

It is a myth that the law regulating ( planned evolution toward prohibition) firearms purchases prohibits felons from having firearms. At best , it just makes it more expensive for them to get a firearm.

Meanwhile the rest of us will have to use archery as a defense tool.

I am working on my spear technique as we speak, and have started accumulating swords.

55 posted on 06/29/2006 2:24:40 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
I definitely don't want the damn Feds having anything to do with muzzle loaders, or any other guns for that matter. I do think that States should be allowed to deny or permit weaponry to convicted felons as they see fit.

My preference would be to forbid them any modern firearms ever, except in the rarest and most worthy cases. Muzzle loaders ought to be permitted after they have served their time and then successfully completed a period of five to seven years without any further run-ins with the law.

This would be fair to minor felons in rural states, most of whom would find it an incentive to stay on the straight and narrow. The gang-bangers would never bother with muzzle loaders, and would be treated even more harshly when they are inevitably convicted for felon-in-posession the next time.

-ccm

58 posted on 06/29/2006 2:59:57 PM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak

One nice thing about muzzleloaders being exempt from federal law is that hobbyists can (and do) make their own from scratch. Muzzleloading cannons fit into the same classification and I've built three (my favorite was turned from 1-5/8" ID x 3-1/4" OD steel machine tubing and it's gotten regular Independence Day usage - with a tomato paste can of black powder). My biggest bore is a mortar that will shoot a 12" long x 9" diameter log to good effect.


59 posted on 06/29/2006 3:06:23 PM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak

Well, THAT headline scared me real good.....


119 posted on 06/30/2006 6:23:12 AM PDT by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson