Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I like a bloke who speaks his mind - more so when he is right!
1 posted on 06/29/2006 5:39:04 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Aussie Dasher
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, to which Buffett has pledged the bulk of his $44-billion fortune, devotes the vast majority of its funding to combating disease and poverty in developing countries. Less than 1 percent has gone to Planned Parenthood over the years. And the Gates Foundation does not permit its gifts to Planned Parenthood to be used for abortion services.

How thoughtful of CNN to help us understand how foolish the worries of anti-abortion people are!

2 posted on 06/29/2006 5:42:30 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
Less than 1 percent has gone to Planned Parenthood over the years.

I love the way the leftists at CNN try to spin this. One percent of tens of BILLIONS is still a huge sum of money.

3 posted on 06/29/2006 5:43:40 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
And the Gates Foundation does not permit its gifts to Planned Parenthood to be used for abortion services.

They don't have to, any money automatically frees up money to be used for those purposes.

4 posted on 06/29/2006 5:45:19 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

It doesn't matter if the Gates don't allow money to be used for the abortion procedure - when you donate to Planned Parenthood in any capacity it just frees up money in other areas of their budget so that they can still spend more on abortion related services.

While the Gates and Buffet money will do lots of good, much of it is also being put in dangerous hands.


5 posted on 06/29/2006 5:45:19 PM PDT by floridavoter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

Wow. Godwin in the article.


6 posted on 06/29/2006 5:46:27 PM PDT by Dinsdale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
This Gloria Feldt person, former obergrupenfuhrer of Planned Parenthood expressed disgust that Right to Life people would think they even had the right to dare criticize super-rich killers such as Warren Buffet and his little friend, Bill Gates.

Of course, she's biased ~ she likes the killers, their money, and the pursuit of the prey as well eh?!

8 posted on 06/29/2006 5:50:40 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

"Less than 1 percent has gone to Planned Parenthood over the years."

That's still about $50,000,000 too much, isn't it?


12 posted on 06/29/2006 6:34:19 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
The Hell of Gates Shall Not Prevail (Gates, Buffett, and the Culture of Death)
13 posted on 06/29/2006 6:37:09 PM PDT by Pyro7480 ("If you wish to go to extremes, let it be in... patience, humility, & charity." -St. Philip Neri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

99% goes to fight disease and poverty. Oh, sure.

But they neglect to mention that pregnancy is universally considered to be a disease by family planners and other babykillers, and that these people also argue that the surest cure for poverty is abortion.


17 posted on 06/29/2006 7:40:24 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

To speak a mind one needs to have it first.


23 posted on 06/29/2006 9:15:52 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

Actually, it IS very good news that Buffet gave his money to the Gates Foundation rather than his own wife's. His own wife is a huge promoter of abortion. Gates' is rather innocuous in comparison


27 posted on 06/30/2006 12:24:02 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

There's so much pouting on these Buffett threads about how he's leaving his money. People are ignoring the idea (which otherwise they would support) that a person should be able to leave his money the way he chooses, because they don't happen to like the issues involved. Leave your own money as you wish.

And at least learn how to spell the name of the person you're criticizing - it's not "buffet", like Sunday brunch.

(And yes, in the interest of full disclosure, Warren Buffett has been very, very good to my family in our 35 years as Berkshire Hathaway investors).


35 posted on 06/30/2006 6:44:28 AM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Siobhan; Canticle_of_Deborah; broadsword; NYer; Salvation; sandyeggo; american colleen; ...

Catholic ping!


60 posted on 06/30/2006 3:41:28 PM PDT by Pyro7480 ("If you wish to go to extremes, let it be in... patience, humility, & charity." -St. Philip Neri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

Buffett's give-away money to Bill Gates was nothing more than a scheme to avoid taxes. Read on...

Buffett thinks this is one tax that's good idea - for others

July 12, 2006

BY ED FEULNER

The federal government won't be getting a windfall of Buffett bucks after all. This year the world's second-richest man, Warren Buffett, turns 76. He's built a fortune worth an estimated $44 billion. He's also a strong proponent of the federal death tax, which (were he to die in 2011) would claim some 55 percent of his estate. So it must have occurred to some IRS bureaucrats that they might eventually cash a probate check for upwards of $20 billion.

But that's not going to happen.

On June 26 Buffett announced plans to give more than $30 billion to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. That's completely reasonable. Buffett is a friend of Bill Gates, and the foundation's good work is well worth supporting. But it's clear that Buffett had more than one reason for giving his fortune away.

Buffett says he wants to shelter his fortune from the tax man. He went so far as to insist that his beneficiaries "must continue to satisfy legal requirements qualifying my gifts as charitable and not subject to gift or other taxes."

Ironically, even as he avoids paying the death tax, Buffett still insists that the tax is critical. "I would hate to see the estate tax gutted," Buffett told reporters as he announced his gift. "It's a very equitable tax." Just not one he wants to pay.

Buffett's actions, while hypocritical, make sense. Death shouldn't be a taxable event.

Lawmakers partially agreed in 2001. That year they started phasing out the death tax. It's scheduled to decline every year until 2010, when it will disappear for one year -- before returning at full strength (55 percent) in 2011.

Liberal New York Times columnist Paul Krugman calls this the "Throw Momma from the Train Act," since it would give people a perverse incentive to die in 2010. The best way to avoid that, of course, is to completely eliminate the death tax -- permanently.

This wouldn't be an extreme step. Some 24 countries including Canada, Australia, India, Mexico, China, Russia and even Sweden (poster child for the welfare state) have no death tax. The fact that the United States still does hurts our global competitiveness. A recent study by the American Council on Capital Formation showed that only two major nations (Japan and South Korea) have higher death-tax rates than the United States.

The death tax is simply bad public policy. It imposes a gigantic burden on small businesses. Family firms built by the sweat of a lifetime's work can be wiped out by the tax when their owners die. Business owners pay an estimated $12 billion each year just for insurance to prepare for the eventual payment of onerous death taxes. That's $12 billion that's not being spent on expanding those businesses through research and development or through hiring new employees.

This perverse situation does help explain Buffett's support of the death tax. His company, Berkshire Hathaway, sells "death tax insurance" to small businesses. And when a small businessman lacks such insurance? Buffett can swoop in to buy small businesses, such as the chain of 63 jewelry stores formerly owned by the Bridge family of Seattle.

Good tax policy is predictable tax policy. Businesses need to know how their profits will be taxed next year if they're going to make the right decisions. By forcing small businesses and family farms to hedge against the future instead of grow into it, the death tax holds back our economy and reduces job growth. Economists at The Heritage Foundation estimate it costs us between 170,000 and 250,000 jobs a year.

It's almost inconceivable that a country founded on the principles of freedom and opportunity is still taxing economic virtue and productivity. As Sen. George Allen (R-Va.) says, there should be "No taxation without respiration."

Warren Buffett has managed to dodge the death tax. It's past time for Washington to kill it off permanently.

Ed Feulner, president of The Heritage Foundation, is co-author of Getting America Right.

http://www.suntimes.com/output/feulner/cst-edt-feul12.html#


68 posted on 07/12/2006 6:52:58 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson