The children --and their battery-- carried out the wishes of the school department
and the gays who control all schools in Massachusetts,
dictator-in-robes Margaret Marshall and the New York Times.
They're fags Jim!
(I need that pic of Bones from Star Trek)
Why do liberals insist on robbing children of their childhoods? I am not sure that first graders can be capable of understanding all the arguments. They are just parroting what their parents are teaching them. This is a sad commentary on this very affluent community. I shudder to think what these first graders will be like as adults.
School officials dispute this claim. They have said allowing parents to remove their kids from class during discussion of alternative family arrangements would stigmatize kids with same-sex parents.
Is there a more blatant statement of public school, PC indoctrination!! First graders being used as pawns. It's disgusting.
If kids of same-sex family arrangements left the classroom that would stigmatize kids with opposite-sex parents?
The children --and their battery-- carried out the wishes of the school department
and the gays who control all schools in Massachusetts,
dictator-in-robes Margaret Marshall and the New York Times.
I was wondering what happened to that guy!
What in the world is a "think sheet"?
Brokeback Ciriculum.
More on David Parker...
Last year, David Parker sued the Lexington school district to contest its refusal to allow him to remove his son from class whenever the subject of homosexuality or same-sex parents is discussed. Parker charged that the school district is required under state law to put in place an “opt out” policy for subjects related to human sexuality.School officials dispute this claim. They have said allowing parents to remove their kids from class during discussion of alternative family arrangements would stigmatize kids with same-sex parents.
“It is a fabrication so fictitious it could have been written by Stephen King,” Besen said. “Virtually nothing is true and the distortions are a deliberate attempt to smear a school district, intimidate administrators and influence a curriculum that has the temerity to suggest that gay families exist and should be treated with respect.”
This examples the taxpayer subsidized homosexual propaganda campaign that David Parker opposes and is up against -what his federal lawsuit filed on April 27, 2006 against the school and the administrators is all about
EXCERPT:
WHEREFORE, plaintiffs, jointly and severally, respectfully request this honorable court:
1. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5 2201, to declare and rule that there exists a justiciable controversy between the plaintiffs and the defendants;
2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5 2201, to issue a declaratory judgment declaring that each defendant has violated each of the plaintiffs' constitutional rights of due process as set forth above;
3. Order equitable and injunctive relief ordering that:
A. The plaintiff parents be expressly and clearly notified prior to any adult-directed or initiated classroom discussions of sexuality, gender identity, and marriage constructs, until such time as the children are in seventh grade. Such notification must be explicit about the content, given in a timely manner, and involve the written consent of parents to opt children into these presentations/discussions.
B. The plaintiff parents be presented with an opportunity to excuse the children from classroom presentations or discussions the intent of which is to have children accept the validity of, embrace, affirm, or celebrate views of human sexuality, gender identity, and marriage constructs.
C. The plaintiff parents be presented with an opportunity to excuse the children from classroom presentations or discussions when the intent is to have children accept the validity of, embrace, affirm or celebrate belief systems or religious perspectives.
D. The plaintiff parents be presented with an opportunity to attend, as silent observers, and record any school presentations or discussions of the aforementioned ideological/socialization perspectives.
E. That no materials graphically depicting homosexual physical contact be submitted to the students until the seventh grade, with the provisions of Sections 3A and 3C.
4. Order payment of compensatory damages to the extent allowed by law;
5. Order payment of special, exemplary, or punitive damages, to the fullest extent allowed by law;
6. Order payment of attorney's fees, expert fees, prejudgment interest, interest, costs and;
7. Provide such additional relief as the court deems just.
Bottom line: There is absolutely no need to introduce faggotry into the classroom. Period. Anyone who supports that is a freak and a sicko.
You can bet your sweet...no, wait a minute, not that. Well, in any case, if this involved the opposite situation, i.e, the kid's parents had been demanding gay studies be included in the curriculum, the MSM would be broadcasting this far and wide as a "hate" crime; the school authorities would be in a dither, apologizing all over the landscape; and the kids involved would be appropriately disclipined and be required to take "tolerance" training of some kind.
I think it was two first graders having a fight and this Mass Resistance is full of it. They are behaving like liberals - they see a situation that they can try to warp into making themselves look like a victim. I don't buy it.
It's amazing how many people will perpetute this lie because it fits into an agenda. The story perpetrated by Mass Resistance is simply untrue. None of it is true and it's a shame a seven year old boy is nothing but a pawn in this fight. The lawsuit is fair and reasonable, and even if he loses it, which is likely, that is the right way of dealing with Parker's concerns over what is being taught in school. The lie about the beating is not fair or reasonable. Give it up and stick to the lawsuit.