Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Times 2, Bush 0
Human Events ^ | June 30 2006 | Patrick J Buchanan

Posted on 06/30/2006 12:50:30 PM PDT by Reagan Man

"For people to leak that program and for a newspaper to publish it does great harm to the United States of America."

So said President Bush of The New York Times' revelation of a secret U.S. program to monitor the international cash transfers of suspected terrorists. "Disgraceful," added an angry president.

Vice President Cheney assailed news organizations that "take it upon themselves to disclose vital national security programs, thereby making it more difficult for us to prevent future attacks against the American people."

Of the Times' decision to expose the secret program, House Speaker Dennis Hastert says: "This is not news. This is something that has been classified; something that is top secret."

Treasury Secretary John Snow wrote Times editor Bill Keller, "In choosing to expose this program despite repeated pleas from high-level officials on both sides of the aisle ... the Times undermined a highly successful counter-terrorist program and alerted terrorists to the methods and sources used to track their money trails."

The U.S. government has thus declared that what the Times did was reprehensible, and rendered aid and comfort to the enemy.

But if Bush believes that, why hasn't his Justice Department been directed to investigate these crimes against the Espionage Act and acts of treason in a time of war?

Rhetoric aside, the core issue here is this:

Does Bush believe the Times committed a crime in exposing the secret financial tracking program and the secret National Security Agency program to intercept U.S. phone calls of suspected terrorists -- for which the Times won a Pulitzer? If he does, why has he not acted?

Why has he not ordered Justice to dig out the disloyal leakers and prosecute their media collaborators, who refused White House requests not to compromise these vital programs? If Bush believes what he is saying, why does he not do his duty as the chief law enforcement officer of the United States?

Asked if the White House would retaliate against the Times, Press Secretary Tony Snow said, "The New York Times and other news organizations ought to think long and hard about whether a public's right to know in some cases might override somebody's right to live."

Nice statement, but the Times' response is: We did reflect, Tony, and we decided to publish. An unstated corollary is: And what are you going to do about it?

The answer so far is that the Bushites are going to do nothing other than fulminate and pound the Post and Times. Bush has every right to do so, and the tactic is effective, for even opponents of the war do not believe journalists are above the law and enjoy special rights to expose security secrets to sabotage any war effort they no longer agree with.

On this issue, Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) is right. He has called for an investigation of the leakers of these secret programs and criminal prosecution of the editors and the publisher of the Times:

"The time has come for the American people to realize and The New York Times to realize we're at war and they can't just be on their own deciding what we declassify, what to release."

Editorialists at the Times and The Washington Post and their kennel-fed columnists and "media critics" are trotting out all the bromides about "the meaning of the First Amendment," "the people's right to know," "the role of the press in a democratic society," etc. And it is a slam-dunk prediction that more Pulitzers and People's Hero awards, like the ones Walter Duranty and Herbert Matthews collected for the Times, are ahead.

Behind the Times' defiance of the law surely lies a gnawing need for redemption. For the Times has been through a bad patch. First, it was revealed Jayson ("Burning Down My Master's House") Blair had hoked up three dozen stories and smoked them right past the Times' editors, who were blinded by the brilliance of their black prodigy. Then, there came the revelation that editor Howell Raines directed the paper to run three dozen stories on the human rights atrocity at Augusta National, where some good ole boys had conspired to keep the girls out of their tree house. After that, there was the Judith Miller fiasco, where the Times stood firm -- then folded in the face of some really big-time fines.

Keller and publisher Arthur Sulzberger appear to have decided the way to recapture lost credibility is to publish national security secrets, as in the Pentagon Papers days of yore.

And, thus far, for all their huffing and puffing, the Bushites have blinked. But this cannot stand. For appeasement will beget new acts of arrogance and aggression by the Times, and other newspapers, until a White House finds the courage to demand that the Times, too, obeys the laws and respects our national security secrets, even if it means putting Bill and Art in the Graybar Hotel for a spell.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: antisemitespeaks; bitterpaleos; buchanan; leaks; mullahpat; nyt; patbuchanan; reaganembarrassment; sedition; spying; thirdpartyloser
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last
To: LS
As I said, I'm not sure how prosecuting a corporate entity would work, but the NYT published the evidence of their lawbreaking themselves. Obviously there's more to the case than just dumping the paper on the bench, like the letters to Santa in Miracle on 34th Street! But to claim that the inadvertent disclosure of the Chicago Tribune during WWII was equivalent to the NYT deliberate disclosure is incorrect.

I've read your posts with respect in the past, so I'm sure it was an oversight, but the Justice Department would actually be the prosecution, not the defense.
41 posted on 06/30/2006 2:15:13 PM PDT by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RAldrich
...the NY Times will clamor that this is a dictatorial, secretive Administration that is trying to spy on people and take away their freedom and privacy...

Which would be different from their current position how?

42 posted on 06/30/2006 2:16:43 PM PDT by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

A broken clock is right twice a day.


43 posted on 06/30/2006 2:22:06 PM PDT by GOPJ ('Pinch' has been named al-Qaida's Employee of the Month for the 12th straight month-Phil Brennan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

:)


44 posted on 06/30/2006 2:22:46 PM PDT by GOPJ ('Pinch' has been named al-Qaida's Employee of the Month for the 12th straight month-Phil Brennan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Pat doesn't know what's going on behind the scenes and neither does anyone else. Tony Snow implied to O'Reilly that the lawyers were looking into what could be done. Obviously the White House can't bring a case unless they know they can win, since all media guns will be aimed at the President for the duration of his term.

No, we don't know, but they ought to be preparing a case. Bush is in fact the nation's chief law enforcement officer and he damn well should at least make the effort at enforcing the law. I'd prefer the Adminstration actually win the case, but ignoring this criminality just enables more of the same. How much classified information should the NYT be allowed to publish on its front page? All they want? Or just until the next domestic attack, at which time the loudest critics of the Bush administration's failure to prevent it will be, you guessed it, the New York Times?

I've reached a position on whether the NYT's White House press credentials should be pulled, and my answer is - not until the case is filed. At that time, they should be. Otherwise it's just petty.

45 posted on 06/30/2006 2:22:52 PM PDT by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
A broken clock is right twice a day.

In Pat's case, it's twice a YEAR, but this is one of them.

46 posted on 06/30/2006 2:24:27 PM PDT by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

That clock only has the cuckoo bird left.


47 posted on 06/30/2006 2:25:18 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: LS

Yes, Pat really IS this stupid; not to mention hateful and spiteful and nauseating!


48 posted on 06/30/2006 2:26:59 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Don't hold your breath. We have lost any chance to put the traders in jail or out of business. The administration has no OO.


49 posted on 06/30/2006 2:28:01 PM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man; All
Everyone needs to calm the F down on this issue.

President Bush is doing the right thing here by giving the Slimes enough rope to hang themselves with. Unfortunately, public opinion is NOT on the President's side here, a lot of people still view the Times as this heroic institution going up against Nixon II.

Bush and the DOJ right now are evaluating the options and letting the facts slowly but surely come out on this rather than knee-jerking and making a spectacle of this. Let the wheels of justice do their grinding, for God's sake.

50 posted on 06/30/2006 2:29:12 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (What you know about that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Neither you nor Pat is "objective" at all. And your nic needs to be changed; it is inaccurate and misleading.
51 posted on 06/30/2006 2:30:34 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

52 posted on 06/30/2006 2:32:04 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
We had traitors in the US who gave atom bomb secrets to the russians.

The granddaughter of Ethel and Julius Rosenberg is an activist AGAINST the US right now.

It has always been good vs. evil. And many many have died in that battle.

We can only pray that we continue to be blessed by electing people like George W. Bush.

53 posted on 06/30/2006 2:33:21 PM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Stop whining. Debate the facts, or STFU.


54 posted on 06/30/2006 2:33:50 PM PDT by Reagan Man (Secure the borders; enforce employer sanctions; stop welfare handouts to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
The answer so far is that the Bushites are going to do nothing other than fulminate and pound the Post and Times.

Only 2 more years left of the wasp Skull&Bones cabal.

The leftist media had better watch out when President Giuliani comes to town.

55 posted on 06/30/2006 2:36:12 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
>>>>The leftist media had better watch out when President Giuliani comes to town.

President Giuliani. LMBO

56 posted on 06/30/2006 2:37:38 PM PDT by Reagan Man (Secure the borders; enforce employer sanctions; stop welfare handouts to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Oooooooooooooo...struck a nerve did I? :-)

I am debating the facts...unlike you and Pat.

57 posted on 06/30/2006 2:37:45 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Deb

**all media guns will be aimed at the President for the duration of his term. **

That's different from the current situation how, exactly? ;)

-George


58 posted on 06/30/2006 2:38:10 PM PDT by Calif Conservative ( rwr and gwb backer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
Are both sides just a bunch of whiners?

Interesting question. It would be preferable to give another answer but, yes, it appears they are.

59 posted on 06/30/2006 2:43:24 PM PDT by michigander (The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
>>>>Oooooooooooooo...struck a nerve did I? :-)

Not at all. I just get tired of wasting my time with all you Bush cheerleaders. RAH RAH RAH!

>>>>I am debating the facts...unlike you and Pat.

Well, your posts at 48, 51 and 57 have nothing to do with what Pat wrote in the article.

60 posted on 06/30/2006 2:46:03 PM PDT by Reagan Man (Secure the borders; enforce employer sanctions; stop welfare handouts to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson