[saganite]

He goes on to contend that the current consensus is dishonest as well as wrong, and motivated more by personal financial concerns than legitimate science - a cheap shot...and disgustingly self-righteous.

His comments are based on his understanding of the way "research" is conducted in this field. Since he's intimately familiar with the process and is one of the nation's preeminent atmospheric scientists I'll take his word for it, despite your own cheap shots at him.

[maine-iac7]

You replied to liberallarry's post:

His comments are based on his understanding of the way "research" is conducted in this field. Since he's intimately familiar with the process and is one of the nation's preeminent atmospheric scientists I'll take his word for it, despite your own cheap shots at him.

Amen

[liberallarry]

His comments are based on his understanding of the way "research" is conducted in this field. Since he's intimately familiar with the process and is one of the nation's preeminent atmospheric scientists I'll take his word for it

He's in this field, doing "research" in it, getting funding to do that "research" but untainted? The only one who's untainted...or one of the few while all his opponents are tainted?

You believe that? I wouldn't admit to such stupidity.