Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DBeers
This means only nominating and seating “Judicial Reagans” to the bench, employing principled, conservative judicial activism, and working to destroy liberalism through strategic litigation.

Lawyers, bleah! How about we just get rid of activist judges and appoint persons who will defend the constitution instead of legislating from the bench?

How about apponting non-lawyers to the bench? It's not a requirement that they be lawyers. I would prefer plumbers, electricians and mechanics on the bench any day over another freaking lawyer.

2 posted on 07/03/2006 12:50:26 PM PDT by Valpal1 (Big Media is like Barney Fife with a gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Valpal1
I would prefer plumbers, electricians and mechanics on the bench any day over another freaking lawyer.

That's a cute "sound bite" but the truth is the "real lawyers" would eat their lunch every single day. There are still plenty of very well qualified judges to pick from like Roberts and Alito.

5 posted on 07/03/2006 12:55:47 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Valpal1
How about apponting non-lawyers to the bench?

Earl Warren was not an attorney. It is better to have someone who knows what they are doing to lead a revolution.

11 posted on 07/03/2006 2:17:26 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Valpal1

I would accept anyone who has good old American common sense.


15 posted on 07/03/2006 2:55:59 PM PDT by maxwellp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Valpal1
How about apponting non-lawyers to the bench? It's not a requirement that they be lawyers. I would prefer plumbers, electricians and mechanics on the bench any day over another freaking lawyer.
Here's a little historical footnote: on the day that Reagan announced the appointment of Sandra Day O'Connor, The Wall Street Journal carried a Letter to the Editor which argued that there should be an economist on the Supreme Court.

I immediately thought, ". . . and I know just the person for that role - Thomas Sowell!"And then I looked at the byline of the letter. It was written by Thomas Sowell!!

Just think if Reagan had done that instead of naming Sandra Liberal O'Connor!


20 posted on 07/03/2006 4:52:39 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Valpal1

Many would agree with you.


24 posted on 07/03/2006 6:51:56 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson