To: LSUfan
And yet, no other attack on American soil in that time, Mr. Clark?
2 posted on
07/03/2006 1:24:53 PM PDT by
50sDad
(ST3d: Real Star Trek 3d Chess: http://my.ohio.voyager.net/~abartmes/tactical.htm)
To: 50sDad
Richard Clarke is a moron. On 9/11 we had approx 3000 die in a terrorist attack. Today we had zero terrorist caused deaths. Ray Charles could see he is wrong and Ray Charles is blind and has been dead for about 2 years.
I wished the right would hammer the left when they make this moronic claim. The left would rather see the USA destroyed than have a republican be correct.
9 posted on
07/03/2006 1:31:14 PM PDT by
Dutch Boy
To: 50sDad
This guy's predictions have been wrong so many times, I wonder why he's quoted anywhere at all.
To: 50sDad
Clark is right for the wrong reasons. True, America is still essentially an open society and open societies are vulnerable to attacks from ambush.
The only way to be relatively safer would be to button everything down, go to ground, and end the free and open life we know..
But while we are no safer, we are fully alerted and better protected. Islam's brave masked warriors must be smarter and better organized than they are to successfully hit us again and get away with it.
I'd say that the Muslim's greatest weakness is their lack of advancement over the past 2000 years. Everything more modern than pottery has come from outside.
Their greatest strength is the Democrat party.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson