[Paladin2]

It would appear to be difficult to tell a fallacious argument from ignorance from a true argument from ignorance from just a general jacking around not knowing anything about the background, knowledge and veracity of the argument proposer and doing some independent literature review of one's own on an unknown topic.

[AntiGuv]

The statement in both the article and the broadcast was crystal clear that his brain was not as severely damaged as hers. Now, you can choose to believe what makes you happy instead, but my comments were predicated on that.

And, at this point I just want to leave this discussion as I've already said. I'm not really interested in it any further. Sorry for being so flippant and dismissive earlier, and goodbye!