Bruce, I've argued that the principles inherent in our founding documents, and the plain words of the Constitution itself in the 2nd, 5th, 9th, 10th & 14th Amendents make it abundantly clear that our RKBA's [in your own words] "-- is an absolute right (subject only to punishment for abuses of the rights of others).
That is, you could own a nuclear weapon, [subject to reasonable regulations on safe storage] but could be prosecuted for misusing it.
The 2nd actually means all arms and it is an absolute right - subject to prosecution for misuse of the arms (such as shooting your neighbor without just cause). --"
You reject that argument.. You've claimed that 'ordnance' can be 'outlawed' by any level of government.
Case closed. -- Feel proud of arguing ~for~ 'gun control'.
Maybe you should learn to read before you come out in the real world. I did not say "you could own a nuclear weapon." I said, IF your argument were valid, you could own a nuclear weapon. Your deliberate misquoting is worthly of a Clinton or a Kennedy.