Replies

Bravo, simply superb Fedora.
As FGS already said your research shows what many have suspected, for years.
It took your exhaustive work to validate all those suspicions though.
My hat's off to you, Sir. ;^)

I found the flow chart (another poster made possible) quite interesting, also.
Interesting by the name(s) the didn't appear, and not for the reasons one might suspect.

Clinton & his co-conspirator female Senatorial accomplice are, of course, who I am referring to.
The absence of either of their names linking them -- anywhere -- to the list of scoundrels perhaps proves just what a sock puppet/stooge he really was.
And how very sly the august senator from New York really is by keeping her name clear of this kind of *association* even though she's up to her naval in all manner of of this crap, what used to be called sedition?
I've a notion you've thoughts of your own concerning the apparent lack of a link also, huh. {g}

In any event, now what to do with this information??
That's what I'm wondering, Fedora.

This WP group's merely one Liberal-Socialist America-hating clique infesting the Republic's media, among many.
There is after all the New York Slimes, The Associated Quislings, Reuters et al ad infinitum all needing a little revealing of their own.
Plus let us not forget the slew of networks to be accounted for, too.

All have a sordid story of their own to explain their *personal* connection to the Liberal-Socialist conspiracy, of that we can be sure.

For you & others such as yourself, people possessed of the uncanny ability to connect-the-dots, it spells "Job Security" like nothing else can.

Your work revealing this group of disgusting bottom feeders is exemplary, simply beautiful.
This Bud's for you, my friend. ;^)

...thanks for the ping, FGS. ;^)

...thanks for the ping, FGS.

The pleasure is all mine ol' man; trust all's well? This was such a wonderful piece of work relating to one our friends in the faux press, I didn't want you to miss it. And I agree, the same amount of sleuthing into the innards of the rest would likely expose similar connections.

As far as what to do with the information??? Same as we've been doing for the last what, six or seven years.....spread it as far and wide as we possibly can. Trouble is, it probably can't be condensed much further than it already is. Given the exhaustive biliography, this indeed appears to be a Cliff's Notes version. The upshot; many people that should and need to read and digest it never will. A conundrum if there ever was one.

Good to "see" you again.

FGS

What to do with the information is a good question worth some serious thought. Here I have mainly tried to collect some data, offer some limited analysis of certain aspects of a very large topic, and include documentation. Putting this information in useful form is another task that will take some more planning and work. I think flowcharts like those posted in some of the follow-up discussion to the article can help with that task. I would have preferred doing something like that to the "arrow" charts I ended up using here, but for a number of reasons that didn't work out. Regarding the Clintons' role in this stuff, I think there are a lot of Clinton links to some of the IPS- and Hayden-associated figures mentioned here, and some of that might be filled in by tracking the continuity between the New Left, the Church Committee, Hayden's 1976 Senate campaign, the Mondale wing of the Carter administration, Mondale's 1984 campaign, and some of Clinton's appointments. There is a ton of excellent information Alamo-Girl's site that would be very interesting to integrate with some of this other stuff.