Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blueflag
Agreed. I mentioned in an earlier thread that I thought the problem originated when they made the EPA happy and stopped using foam made with a freon based propellant.

Blasted liberal environmentals.

10 posted on 07/04/2006 2:31:11 PM PDT by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: pctech
I mentioned in an earlier thread that I thought the problem originated when they made the EPA happy and stopped using foam made with a freon based propellant.

This was discussed here after Columbia disintegrated. I'm pretty sure that NASA (and its contractors, insofar as space flight related activities go) are *exempt* from the boneheaded environmental laws. IIRC, NASA chose to reformulate the insulation anyway, and seems to have stuck by that decision rather than going back to the less troublesome recipe. This is a self-inflicted wound that NASA keeps picking at, rather than treating it and getting it to heal.

72 posted on 07/04/2006 5:41:29 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Free Travis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson