I think that you are right. But I would ask you to consider the following. Who else was part of "employing" Clinton to do as he did.............. giving away the store to empower China and consequently empower others. Why was it allowed?
And, why is it not being exposed in any meaningful way by the old media now?
I think I know the answer and the answer is pretty ugly.
****
To know that the destruction of America has been a conscious, ongoing affair is a very unpleasant possibility (probability).
I couldn't say just how many might be involved and so I'm not sure just who you might be thinking about. I have always wondered where the patriots in the DoD were when oversight was switched from them to the DoC. Where were the generals ready to fall on the sword for love of country? What were they thinking in the Pentagon? Were they just too absorbed with empowering radical Muslims in Kosovo to care?
Oddly enough Tim Russert seemed to be the only person in the whole world who was upset about it. I know Rush talked about it but I don't recall outrage. I figured Russert finally dropped it because he was beginning to look insane for the simple reason that he was alone in decrying it and no one responded to him. But perhaps he was dissuaded in a more direct way.???
Of course you may have been expecting some sort of outrage from Pubbie pols at the time!?! Well they were drooling at the prospect of giving China MFN status. They practically knocked Dems over in the aisles to get their votes recorded. The same Country Club Pubbies are now working on how to get around the electorates will to bring in 100 million Mexican and Latin American mud-job workers in the next 20 years.
Those are my immediate thoughts on who allowed Clinton to commit the most egregious act of treason in, possibly, all of human history and why.