Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Joe Brower

I have read quite a few threads here on FR in regards to Katherine Harris and noted the amount of arguing and bickering that goes on. I would have to say the term "controversial" does indeed apply.


16 posted on 07/06/2006 9:50:46 AM PDT by contemplator (Capitalism gets no Rock Concerts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: contemplator
"I would have to say the term "controversial" does indeed apply."

By that metric, the "controversial" pejorative would apply to almost every politician in existence.

My initial comment was focused exclusively on how the media has manufactured an all-pervasive, negative zeitgeist around Ms. Harris that even many self-professed "free thinkers" on this forum have swallowed hook, line and sinker. That, to me, is much more "controversial".

Since the left failed in its slow-motion attempted bloodless coup in late 2000, the leftmedia has has nothing but rabid harred for KH, and has spared no effort in portraying her negatively at every opportunity. "White is black, black is white", and all that...

17 posted on 07/06/2006 11:21:30 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: contemplator

No , you're just seeing the DU infiltrators trying to dissaude the people on FR from supporting Harris . They despise Harris ,just as much, if not more than W . They infiltrated a long time and have been laying in wait to come out against our candidates that they hate the most .


18 posted on 07/06/2006 11:47:56 AM PDT by FRONTLINER (Katherine Harris for Senate '06 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson