Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tailgunner Joe
The title is misleading. It gives the impression that the SCOTUS has ruled in favor of retaining the cross. The article is a historical recitation, devoid of any information on a ruling in this case.
3 posted on 07/06/2006 10:34:26 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Myrddin

I believe the title is intended to be a plea rather than a statement of fact.


6 posted on 07/06/2006 10:44:53 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson