Dees has levelled a lot of spurious charges in the past. His stock in trade is to make a few minor charges that are based in fact and then throw in some whoppers that are pure fiction but also are hard to track down. After all, to refute the charge, you in effect have to prove a negative.
You really should reconsider your willingness to go along with what Morris Dees puts out.
I don't agree with everything Dees says. But when post stuff and references newspaper articles and even even the publications of these groups it is not hard to go to that origianl source. PLus what does Dees have to do with this anyway. It is pretty much a red herring. It is not just Dees saying it.